St Kilda - are they underachievers or over rated??

Question

Every year is going to be their year - what happens??

Answer 1

St Kilda is finished for 2008

Answer 2

A bit of both, they have the potential to be really good but in the end they aren't so good.

Answer 3

Both. People say the have a strong forward line, back line, mid-field etc. They play well but they can't match the level of their opponents. They have some fabulous players like Jason Gram, Leigh Montagna, Nick Riewoldt- Very consistent players but need to lift their team. St.Kilda at the moment are just ordinary.

Answer 4

Saints, Tigers are perennial losers continue to waste everybodys time.

AFL should cut them as well as Freo and one other loser team, make it a 12 team comp, where everybody plays each other twice and all our problems are solved.

A nice even draw will result.

Thank you and Goodnight.

Answer 5

overrated!! i hate the 'G'ay train' :]

Answer 6

Yeah it must break poor old Mollys heart its a pity because I like to cheer for the underdog.

Answer 7

St Kilda are overrated. They had their oppurtunity to win the flag a couple of years ago when their list was at it's peak. I think they missed the boat!

Answer 8

well on paper they look good!

but fail to preform!

ive been waiting all my life for a grand final!

my dad took my sisters to their one and only grand final in '66 but i was born in '68, so i am still waiting!!

all i can do is wait until they pull they socks up and start winning some real games!

but i do live in hope!!

Answer 9

over rated by a mile, a good team doesn't sit 9th on the ladder with more lost games than won. their window has long gone.

Answer 10

both.

and they are finished for 08 (as XMAN said)

Answer 11

Both. They've definitely have a good enough list this year and last to at least make the top 8 and play finals, so they have underachieved in that sense. After finishing 6th in 2006 they deserved to be talked-up but I think they were spoken too highly of and still are over rated.