Sting vs Jeff Jarret.....again?!?

Question

I heard this off of a youtube comment and started to agree with it.Why does TNA keep rehashing feuds over and over again?It's like for example Samoa Joe vs Kurt Angle,come on why can't we see Sting vs AJ or something?I want to see your opinion.

Answer 1

I'd like Sting vs. AJ, but for No Surrender Jarrett vs. Sting would be a good return match for Jarrett. Maybe triple threat with Sting vs. Jarrett vs. AJ.

Answer 2

Naw man its going to be the "respect my authority" old wrestlers vs the "whatever I do what I want" young guys....the big question is who is on Joe's side.....

Answer 3

TNA really has no choice but too. Just like the RNC this week, they are having to "manufacture" storylines and fueds because most of the wrestlers get along pretty well there. There is not any real suspense or believable premises there. (As one should expect considering that TNA is built on a "non conflictual" platform.)

Answer 4

WWE does it too, if the situation is right then they should do feuds over again. Same with Y2J and Shawn Michaels, we've seen it in the past but now its the best feud in the WWE. With Jarrett and Sting nothing was really settled in their feud, Jarrett left, but it was assumed he would return and feud with Sting again somewhere down the road.

Answer 5

actually wwe does the same thing and they dont just keep rehashing feuds over and over again they do that like 10 times more

Answer 6

I don't know, TNA's just lame. They could be way better, but they don't do smart stuff.

Answer 7

Because they just don't have that many great ideals they start storylines & out of nowhere there over with no real ending