Super liga was it a fruad?

Question

do u think that pachuca should of win that game?

Answer 1

No fraud - just circumstances that clearly and unequivocally favored the MLS teams.

Yes Pachuca was robbed of the Caballero goal ... and they are the better team ... but they didn't outplay Houston on Tuesday.

Play the tournament next year in Mexico, with the Mex teams always having home advantage, and the MLS teams flying all over Mexico in between games, and the results would change accordingly (unfortunately all the $$ is up north, so it ain't gonna happen).

Answer 2

It seems like it because in the Pachuca vs.Houston Dynamo game the refri was more in favor to the american team for ex. he held back one of Pachucas goals!

Ok if the Mexican team won like that the story would be way different but to the american fans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...

Answer 3

no, its pretty good warm up for the participating teams, rising pachuca, atlante, chvas and santos chances of beating the other teams

Answer 4

Frank what are you talking about? I'll accept the fact that in other cases that would be true with many Mexicans but that wasn't the case in this game. The goal Pachuca scored was a legitimate goal and you can't say that the ref didn't influence in that. If Pachuca would have received that goal they would have dominated from then on. And same thing in the other game Atlante had a play where the NE.R. player had a hand ball in the box that should have been a penalty. They also called to plays offside on Atlante that were legitimate but they were called offside.