Telekinetics.?

Question

Watch This First:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=CGtQjzVZBZs

in common science, everything in the universe is of a slow vibration. Light, sound, matter, ourselves.

Atoms are so tiny, that 7.5 Trillion atoms fits in the period at the end of this sentence.

Everything between you and any object you decide to look at, is made up of atoms. Everything that makes up a human being, is made up of atoms.

Elements are nothing more than a compound of atoms. Per se, when 2 atoms clump aside from 3 atoms clumping.. the result is 2 separate elements.

Electrons[in the video] are a major component that makes up an atom itself.

So in the fact that everything in the universe reacts by simply observing it, or thinking about it, it would show that focusing all of your attention towards one object would result in telekinetics.

Also giving off the fact that everything in existance is of one consciousness. Subjectively, we are the subconsciousness of ourselves.

Opinions?

Answer 1

yea this is one thing that has always been on my mind like you say on that if nothing is able to be a thought then nothing is some thing it can get really weird to think along that line though to much but it is a great thing to realize that every thing we know to be fake can actually also be real from just that fact in your question but also have to watch the video to in order to see more to learning what that means in the question

Answer 2

Elements are different "classes" of atoms, each element has a specific number of protons. The number of protons is the overwhelmingly defining characteristic of an atom.

When two atoms of like or different types combine, grouping together, they form a "compound".

In a way, it is true that as you said, all particles in the universe "respond" to observation. We have confirmed this through numerous experiments on the quantum scale.

However, on the large scale (anything larger than a few atoms), any possible changes made by observation would tend to be canceled out because according to all theory and observable data, the changes so induced are not controllable.

Much modern technology (semi-conductors that make your computer work not least among them) depends on the random nature of these quantum behaviors.

Your reasoning is interesting, and your position one not unexplored and appreciated by philosophers and scientific minds! Look into some basic quantum mechanics, and you'll see that these things are true, and much more interesting than you might imagine. I can highly recommend the book "Fabric of the Cosmos" by Brian Greene for this.

Answer 3

About the clip? Interesting, good job.

About your extrapolations and musings? Not so much. "Everything in the universe" does NOT react simply by observing it -- here  you are confusing subatomic particles, which exhibit quantum weirdness, with objects comprising quintillions of atoms, which do NOT exhibit quantum weirdness.

When you get into consciousness you are making an unjustified leap into pseudoscience. Focusing all of your attention towards one object would NOT result in telekinetics. And concluding that "everything in existance [sic] is of one consciousness" is New Wave nonsense.

Kudos for getting into real science -- but stick with the real stuff. This New Age silliness you're dabbling in will never lead anywhere useful.