Tennis, Borg, Agassi, Nadal. Is having short little legs essential to tennis success?

Question

And please don't tell me that anyone or all of them are 6'1" or more. That does not mean that they don't have short little legs. Apart from which I am 6'1" so to me they are short men apart from the fact they have short little legs.

Answer 1

No matter how angrily I respond, it's not gonna compare to having a guy to sleep next to tonight is it.

Answer 2

Borg didn't have very short legs my man.

Rod Laver is another guy though.

It's not much of an advantage, just the way it is.

Answer 3

You're right. Shorter legs mean that you have better movement. I mean, look at Ivo Karlovic!! He's 6'10", has the longest legs on the ATP Tour, and he can't play a point, only serve. Leg size is a difference in my opinion.

Answer 4

Rafa new wimbledon champion 2008 !!! Oh the glory !!! Vamos Rafa the hot spainard prevails. He got beautiful legs :P a very hot body and a cute face !!! wooooooooo

Answer 5

Pete Sampras hadn't short legs I think... neither John McEnroe or Jimmy Connors. I don't think so. They're just magnificent and virtuous players.

Answer 6

short legs...long legs? it doesn't matter in my opinion as long as you can play the game and win that's all that counts...well done Nadal and I think he's got lovely legs amongst other things!