The Crucible - Question?

Question

Could someone give me at least two examples of how the people in charge are being "legalistic" in Acts III - IV

Answer 1

In those days, religion was law, so you will find several there.  Also, Hale advises prisoners to confess to witchcraft, so that they can live. Proctor signs a confession, but retracts it when he realizes that Danforth intended to nail the confession to the church door (which Proctor fears will ruin his name and the names of other Salemites).

Here are a few sites that should help you with The Crucible.

http://www.bellmore-merrick.k12.ny.us/cr...

http://www.pinkmonkey.com/booknotes/monk...

http://www.gradesaver.com/classicnotes/t...

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/crucible/

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/LitN...

Answer 2

One obvious example is when Danforth asks Proctor about his religous beliefs (i.e. to name the ten commandments and asking how often he goes to church)

Another example is when Danforth says "the pure of heart need no lawyers." This is the mindset of this court. Religious practices act as legalistic bases in this court. The difference between guilty and innocent is determined by religous beliefs and practices.

Both examples are in Act III