I'm still undecided about my vote, although I'll admit that I'm leaning towards McCain. My question is about the wisdom of the Obama campaign tearing into to Palin's lack of experience.
Obama has some, but not a lot of political experience, all as a legislator. Palin has some, but not a lot experience as a legislator, an administrator and a chief executive. Can Obama really attack her lack of experience? Doesn't that leave him vulnerable to the a counter-attack on the same issue? And even if it is a valid criticism against her, isn't an inexperienced VP better than an inexperienced President?
Anyway, I'm most interested hearing what Obama supporters think about this issue, either agreeing or explaining why he does have experience and she does not. Of course, I welcome all positions and sides of the debate, but let's keep this civil and the answers on point, no random attacks against either side. Thanks in advance.
Tags: