The Madeleine Abductors new sketches - could she be the woman gripping little girls wrist in CCTV image

Question

Compare this :

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=250247&in_page_id=34

To this:

And HIM, could he be the man walking away with Madeleine that night, cut his hair and grown a pathetic caterpillar on his lip?

Answer 1

You don't get it do you...It's ALL discredited info.......

Why did you "Sensationalise " the gripping of her wrist when you can clearly see They are holding hands?....

Answer 2

no, kate and gerry ruled this child out!

Answer 3

Unfortunately,we could all speculate and elaborate

on pics and hear say.

The only real danger of this is ,not finding the Truth.

It is solid hard evidence and h**l of a lot of hard work inbetween that is going to find the whereabouts of this Little Sweetheart.

I along with many,am doubtful of her being alive,but I pray that she is.

Sorry Ethel,the statement is there in your link,that this little girl is not Madeleine.

And I have studied the pic as best I can and see no evidence that the woman is grasping the little girls wrist.

Answer 4

I think the cadaver odour in Madeleine's apartment is the proof that the poor child is dead. also, do you have kids? not everyone allows their child to 'roam' freely about a shop, why on earth do you think that??? I don't see the woman 'gripping' that child's wrist, I see her holding her hand, ..I don't see any problem in holding your child's hand in a shop.. ludicrous to suggest otherwise!

oh and lol@ kat kat, she has it right, it is in the link you provided ..  

Answer 5

first of all the woman in the picture is holding the childs hand" NOT GRIPPING " the child by the wrist, secondly why was the child allowed to wonder freely around the shop, and finally the maccanns them selves have said it was not Madeleine, so why this is being used by them as a smoke screen makes no sence what so ever

Answer 6

Yeah, I agree with Katkat above ~ kate has said it's not Madeliene, why all these stories are on the front pages, I do not know.

Answer 7

Oh isn't it strange how all of a sudden LOADS of people are coming forward to say they saw this child and that they're ALL sure it was her, even stranger that being so convinced that they saw this child not one of them seem to have had the b*lls to grab the kid and shout for the police!!!! If i was that certain it had been this child i WOULD, as a mother myself, have taken my chances, grabbed the kid away from whomever had her and shout for the police!  I no more believe that these people have seen this child than i believe in fairies! and what's more, Kate and Gerry Mcann KNOW none of these sightings will be her! My own personal opinion, but there you have it.

Answer 8

Poor Madeleine is dead ,and anyway this girl looks nothing like her. All spin and rubbish

ERRR no, I didn't kill her but K & G did.

Answer 9

I'm afraid all these so-called sightings and other snippets from the police files, together with sound bites from Clarence Mitchell, are yet another attempt to portray the parents as victims rather than perpetrators.

Answer 10

madeline was not abducted, show me any evience or proof???

nice try Clarance but i dont fall for your pathetic pr srunts

Answer 11

the woman in the picture is holding the hand of a child, i dont see anything scary about this, it states (as i mentioned the other day on here) that Kate saw the cctv images that are currently being bandied about, and said that it wasnt madeline. it is not madeline.

i have seen a picture of a man in today's metro, some drawing, it looks the spitting image of gerry except that it has a pencil moustache on it, should we now start accusing him????

Answer 12

If you look at the article with the very first link that YOU gave, you will see it states at the bottom of article

""But the lead came to nothing after the McCanns said the girl in the image was not their daughter.""

Clarence usually conveniently forgets that bit.