The enviroment should be our first priority?

Question

We are doin a debate on the enviroment. The topic is 'The enviroment is our first priority. We're proposing. Any ideas on what we could talk about specifically on natural disasters or health. 9 minutes until lunch so HELP!

Answer 1

i think yes,The enviroment should be our first priority!!!

china has been prevention their nation,how's us?

http://www.pollutionprevention.cn/

Answer 2

If the environment were not to be our first priority then it would be the ruination of the earth for generations to come..lol

Answer 3

its a circular thing, a positive feedback. poor folk have to use what they can, causing environmental damage, rich companies get away with doing whatever they like, so more damage.

more justice and equality, better health and education, lower birth rates, less damage, less need to use 'wild' \resources.

'earth care, people care, fair shares'.

Answer 4

bon apatite

http://byderule.multiply.com/journal/ite...

http://byderule.multiply.com/journal/ite...

http://byderule.multiply.com/journal/ite...

http://byderule.multiply.com/journal/ite...

http://byderule.multiply.com/journal/ite...

http://byderule.multiply.com/journal/ite...

Answer 5

It's too big a question.  There are too many angles to give any kind of decent answer.

We can NEVER put the environment back to how it was before man evolved.

There is a trade-off between the environment for mankind and the environment for the rest of nature.  To the rest of nature MANKIND is the pollution.

If mankind makes the environment unsustainable for people, then people will die out but nature will continue and will establish a new equilibrium without us.

We cannot 'save' the environment but we can extend its suitability for mankind.

Stopping the damage to the environment will involve radical changes in the way humans live their lives.  Most of us are not willing to give up the trappings of civilisation so talk of saving the planet is mostly hot air.

It is still a good idea to try.  Even a little bit is better than nothing and it buys us time.  What we do with that time remains uncertain.

Answer 6

well tis is an opinion , but I think that it should be one of our first priorities.

Answer 7

We should really act now because in 2027(or is it 2048?) or some time around there it is believed that we will reach the tipping point, ( which is where it is to the point where we are to late and it's to late to reverse the horrible things we have done to this Earth and to too late to save humanity!)

CARE FOR IT!

Answer 8

no it shouldnt

Answer 9

This is big. because if we don't stop the world form ending then it going to be like the end. The world should be are first priority, and thats that.

Answer 10

if our environment is destroyed so are we along with it. sorry im so late