The future of the world is in the hands of the technologist or a naturalist??

Question

if it's the naturalist, why??

if it's the technologist, why??

Answer 1

Is there some kind of hard and fast dividing line that separates the two?  

Can't a naturalist also embrace technology (many of them currently do, BTW) without losing credibility or respect of their peers?

Even if they don't cross-pollenate, the two factions can be much more effective working together, than working against one another.

Answer 2

The future of the world is in the hands of naturalistic technologists and technologically knowledgeable naturalists.

Answer 3

it's very dificult but i think that is the technologist because we will can to change and answer the pollution over the world.

Answer 4

Both need to be in harmony.

=]

Answer 5

both