The mater means phisic and anti mater means no phisic?

Question

in our univarse the sciences and phisic as some condition and how mutch univarsesand abou anti materwhat afteranti mater

Answer 1

Go to:

All categories ----> Science & Mathematics -----> Physics.

Answer 2

Hello Ismail M.

Matter and antimatter are nearly the same. The difference between the particles that make up matter and the particles that form antimatter is that the particles that form antimatter have exactly the opposite electric charge. Both matter and antimatter have physical existence and mass. The antiparticle of the electron is the positively charged anti-electron, or positron. The positron is produced naturally in certain types of radioactive decay, and is detected in much the same way as are electrons.

Antimatter does not seem to form from anti-particles except under very special artificial conditions in this universe because the universe is currently filled with normal matter and when antimatter comes into contact with normal matter they are both destroyed with a huge release of energy.

This is the problem with creating antimatter for experimentation. The difficult problem is that the antimatter must be contained in a total vacuum and kept from contact with the container by a magnetic field.

This does not work for very long. Even the best vacuum humans can make is not perfectly free of stray particles of normal matter and they collide with the antimatter causing it to spontaneously decay and be annihilated by contact with particles of matter.

Matter and antimatter are both affected by physical laws in the same way except for the opposite electrical charge. In a magnetic field a positron would turn in the opposite direction from an electron. A proton and an anti-proton would also turn in opposite directions in a magnetic field.

How much antimatter is there in the universe? The only antimatter we have ever encountered was created artificially in laboratory experiment.

One of the greatest mysteries of the universe is its apparent composition of only matter, and not antimatter. If matter and antimatter were created equally at the time of the Big Bang, matter and antimatter should have annihilated into pure energy. That clearly did not happen so the problem of what conditions produced the resulting asymmetric universe (composed of only matter) remains unsolved by science at this time.

The philosophical part of this question is perhaps what you are asking... Were the events leading to the baryon asymmetry observable or were they unobservable because the asymmetry breaks the frame of the observable? At this time physicists simply do not know, and they have no way to answer this question meaningfully.