The real truth about Smith & Wessons Sigma series.?

Question

A lot of people say the Sigma is rubbish, most of them have never acutally used one, they've recieved their info 2nd-hand.

"Sigma is a Glock clone"

It's true that it's polymer and has similiar parts, but the Sigma is comfier and to me actually resembles a H&K USP more than a Glock

"The material melts" There has only been on instance of that, and the person recieved it second-hand. The gun was probabally exposed to chemicals or something.

"Trigger is stiff"

It just takes getting used to.

"Doesn't load/eject"

Try using the right bullets.

"It's unaccurate"

All double-action pistols are.

By the way, some models of Sigma are actually very bad (like ones of a certain calibre are more likely to jam), but the ones that aren't faulty are superb.

Yes, the Sigma has flaws, and when you compare those attributes or features, others may seem better, but if you hold it in your hand and shoot it, it's lots of fun and very accurate. Comparing it overall, in general, to other firearms is the best way of getting an accurate view.

If anybody has actually USED one, what do you think about it? Suitable for law enforcement? Shooting sports?

Answer 1

i own a 40 caliber sigma series , and really the only flaw or problem i have is the difficulty in finding parts and accesories for the gun . it is very reliable , doesnt jam and is very accurate when you get used to it . the closest thing i experienced to material melting was after firing several hundred rounds at the range the front site fell off , not too unresonable due to the fact that it is held on with thin plastic . yes the trigger is stiff , it has to be that is the safety foe the gun . once you get used to it , its fine . i have never had a problem laoding or ejecting . and although it is not the most accurate gun i have used it is still very accurate .

Answer 2

i think the same as diesel