The truth about September 11, 2001?

Question

I have been researching the ideas that 9/11 was an inside job, or at least was known about. I ask you to give me your opinion (whether it was or not) and why you think so, along with reasoning and/or facts as to why I should believe you.

Answer 1

It appears to be at least in part a conspiracy.  

Col. Robert Bowman summarized it well with these words

"… at least they made it impossible for those planes to be intercepted.  If our government had merely did nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot—I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to. If our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. My sisters and brothers, that is treason."

- Dr. Robert Bowman Lt. Col., USAF, ret., Decorated air combat veteran; head of Star Wars programs under Presidents Ford & Carter; Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech; leading expert on national security.

The question "who was behind it" is more complicated. It certainly was not President Bush although he does know was.

Understanding motivation for 9/11 requires an understanding of what the President's father, George H.W. Bush, meant by "New World Order", in this words "a big idea". In short, "new world order" means global government.  There are so many theories about new world order that people overlook what is happening NOW.  That is, gradual implementation of global government and dismantling of national sovereignty. I discussed it in more detail in my answer to this question:-

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

Learn about the Council on Foreign Relations and how globalist organizations control foreign policy. See:-

http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/merupert/...

http://presidentialcandidates.wetpaint.c...

Read from the CFR's web site and its publications (including North American integration) and connect the dots. It is patently obvious that CFR wants global government.

http://www.cfr.org/

The global government proponents are not exactly shy about their ideology.  Freedom and democracy are not in the plans. The vision is similar to communism, with wealthy elites and corporations controlling the government. The new world order crowd is well on their way to success. We are already half way there with the WTO. How laughable it is that most people think that North American union is a myth yet there is a draft bill in Congress opposing it (HR40) .

The Constitution and Bill of Rights are major impediments to global government. An excuse was needed to begin the dismantling thereof, and 9/11 delivered that. How convenient was it that a single event also served (indirectly) to induce us to accept illegal war.

If the official excuse that air defense and intelligence failures were honest mistakes, then why were people at the top not held accountable? If the government was a corporation, heads would have rolled and there would have been mass-firings, including the CEO. That did not happen after 9/11. Rather, people responsible for "mistakes" were promoted. The first order of business should have been addressing the reason for the failures and firing many people. Instead, the government chose to start the gradual and on-going undermining of the Constitution and creation of a surveillance state in America.

There is a great deal of compelling evidence for government foreknowledge in the 9/11 attacks.  You can read about some of it here:-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info...

http://www.rense.com/general24/t500.htm

http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/dece...

Also see this one hour video taped speech of Mike Ruppert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy9JCDchk...

Keep in mind that if the government was involved, it was not "the government". Rather, it was criminal elements inside the government and their associates outside the government. Most members of the government were honestly deceived, threatened into silence, or frightened into self-censorship.

The corporate main stream media protects the criminals by muzzling the 9/11 story and painting anyone questioning it as a radical moron so as to divide the people and discourage any questioning of the official story.  I discussed that in more detail in my answer to this question:-

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

As 9/11 was EXPLOITED to kick the global government agenda into high gear, it is more fruitful to focus 9/11 learning on "why" and "who benefited" rather than the "how was it done". We may never know how it was done because much of the evidence was illegally destroyed.

To inspire thought about "why", research the neo-conservative think tank "Project for a New American Century". Read its 2000 manifesto, "Rebuilding America's Defenses, Strategy Forces and Resources for a New Century", describing their geopolitical aspirations. It seems eerily familiar to what we see happening now.  This page contains a summary as well as a link to the full text:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info...

Learn who the members were and their ties to and positions in the Bush administration and the CFR (for starters, d**k Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, Scooter Libby, Richard Perle, John Bolton, William Kristol .. ) Is the word neo-con starting to jump out at you?  Don't let that mislead - there are neo-liberal ties to 9/11 as well.

Also watch Mike Ruppert's film about geopolitics, criminality in government, evidence of foreknowledge and exploitation of 9/11:-

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Ruppert only briefly connects the dots to discuss global government then the film ends abruptly. Watch for that, otherwise you may mistakenly interpret his message as meaning the wars are merely about peak oil.  

Ruppert also discusses Zbigniew Brzezinski, foreign policy adviser to Obama. Brzezinski's ideology is eerily familiar to that of PNAC.   Look up Brzezinski's connections to PNAC members, Council on Foreign Relations, and globalist and traitor, David Rockefeller.

Both Brzezinski and PNAC were prophetic about the need for a false flag operation to kick off the war plans.  9/11 served their geopolitical agenda marvelously.  [It was intentional that I did not pluralize the word "agenda" in that last sentence.].

For a full understanding of 9/11, it is very important to know the flaws of the 9/11 Commission and its investigation. See the speeches of David Ray Griffin, both at Google Video:-

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

To assist with analyzing the 9/11 Commission Report, use the report mirror at "911 Research" site. The mirror addresses the problem that the official report online is not presented in a way easy to evaluate (hmm). The mirror ties it all together with hyperlinks and commentary to note contradictions and omissions.

Main page - http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/comm...

Report Mirror - http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/comm...

Families of victims of 9/11 documented frustrations with the 9/11 Commission in their film:-

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Don't buy the myth that is just kids, kooks, and hippies questioning the official account of 9/11. There are high profile people questioning 9/11.  See this list for a sampling:-

Patriots Question 9/11

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Even some 9/11 Commissioners have spoken publicly about obstruction to their investigation. Surprisingly, that story was covered by main stream media (a rarity for anything that questions the official account of 9/11). See:-

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/0...

If you do your own research, be careful. Government disinformation sites exit all over the web, designed to throw you off the trail. They discredit truth seeking by putting out ridiculous theories that are easily debunked (e.g. the "no planes theory" ). There are paid agents all over the web posting as users in forums like this one. Some of my Yahoo contacts discussed that issue recently, in this question:-

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

For online 9/11 research, you might start with this well-sourced site:-

http://911research.wtc7.net/

Arab terrorism is real.  The terrorists hate us because of our foreign policy, not because of our freedom. Despite shoddy port and border security, we have not been attacked here since 2001. Hmm. Why then is dismantling civil liberties more important than securing borders and ports? For ports, the reason is there is no real threat. For borders, the reason is the criminals pulling the strings in government WANT illegal immigration. Dissolving borders is necessary for North American union and later for new world order. That political parties blame each other for failing on illegal immigration is just pageantry to forestall action. Both sides want illegal immigration because both sides have been hijacked by globalist interests.

Answer 2

Whether it was or not, I don't belive now's the time for bringing about another conspiracy.

It won't help the situation that's occuring NOW, and won't do anything but create more of a divide around this great country.

This isn't the time for that kind of talk. Let history, when this is all cooled over, uncover the truths.

Answer 3

Simply go to www.squidoo.com/patrioticone

All of your questions will be answered, and you will probably have some new ones.

Answer 4

did you listen to any of the 9/11 commissions hearing's?

it was no inside job but bush should have known about it. he receives daily briefings from the intelligence communities and right up until 9/11, bush was being told "somethings going on." did he act on this intel? no. don't ask me "why not". we're talking about George W....who knows what's in his mind.

fbi and cia agents did alert their superiors but it never went anywhere. there was very little sharing of intel between agencies. you can go on forever about why 9/11 happened and you're not going to reach a satisfactory answer. 9/11 was messed up long before it happened. no one wanted to listen to the people who knew.

Answer 5

I do not think it was an "inside job" nor anyone know before the attack actually happened.

HOWEVER, there were warning signs.

The blind shiek that tried to take the towers down several years prior.

Prez Clinton had Pennsylvania Ave blocked for "security" reasons.

Flight 800

Lockerbee

and the American world view, that NOONE could ever do anything as crazy as this. To consider the possibility would have been considered "racial profiling".

Answer 6

it can' be an inside job.There were millions of Americans in it and 3000 were killed in the terrorist attack organized by bin ladin.If it had been an inside job ,  the risks were it to be revealed to the public are TOO GREAT  and anywayeven if they could manage to keep it a secret , it still would be an enormous blow to the economy.Plus , the govt spent millions building it and now re-building it and also paying compensation and relief to the  men and women who died in the attack.and btw , I read a few years back bin ladin personally praising the men who hijacked the plane on news.

Answer 7

It is absolutely NOT an inside job. To me it is just totally inconceivable that America could do that kind of thing in her own backyard.

Answer 8

I think you should stop posting about it on Yahoo Answers, its not like your gonna solve it on here.  Even if you find out it is an inside job, then what.....

Answer 9

I'm pretty sure it was.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...

Answer 10

Here's what I can tell you for sure (and I have proof) about 9/11/01...I was in a class at UMass Dartmouth...and the janitor sent us home and all classes were canceled...and it took me 45 mins to leave the small campus because of traffic.  And THAT is the truth!!!