Theories of Evolution?

Question

body - Flesh

body - heart

body - brain

body - eyes

body - mouth }

body - lips }

body - ears

body - organs - liver

body - hair,facial hair,pubic hair etc.

body - intestine

body - throat

body - skeleton

body - hands

body - arms

body - legs

body - feet

body - blood

body - vains

body - muscle

body - tissue

body- fingers

body - cells

Un able to fit any more

Physical is something that has a distinct, separate existence.= Soul Inerbody = physical human being

Such as A copy a Rough draft and a final copy at work you save the final copy

the body is a duplicate just a rough draft which can be thrown away our soul is kept and

is graded not our body.

is that an okay theory ??

(Energy) = Activity

Brian = Translator of what (Energy) wants to do.

Feeling = Underscribable but Logical = brian = translation = (Energy)

Kinetic Energy = Motion

work of the same

magnitude would be required to return the body to a state of rest from that velocity.

Answer 1

ur theory is interesting but I think u need to modify it. Most of ur statements r disproved by previous experiments.

Answer 2

Most of what you are saying doesn't seem to make any sense.

And your theory is not okay, it's falsified by numerous experiments. For example, people have suffered significant personality changes after brain damage. As people's bodies grow older, they tend to reason more slowly.

Now, you can "fix" your theory. For example, you can argue that as people get older, perhaps the "connection" between the soul and the body gets weaker, but the soul is still perfect.

But if you "fix" a theory every time the evidence is against it, it stops being a theory and becomes instead an article of faith. No rational person could hold that as a theory, only as an article of faith.

Sorry to break it to you.

Answer 3

Life is a series of chemical reactions.

Incredibly complex, but just chemical reactions.

It is not as deep and meaningless as your description, but in the end, it doesn't matter.

If you want to comfort yourself by thinking that the soul exists and is somehow immortal, then please yourself.

But it is not scientific, and you can never prove the soul exists, no matter how much you want it to.

.

Answer 4

Your statements are merely thet .They have no basis as a theory as you provide no data, no framework, no logical progression, and no way to derive experiments to test your hypotheis ( if you even had one ). Because YOU belive something does not make it true and , in fact because a whole lot of people belive something to be true does not make it so..e.g., several hundred years ago everyone ( or at least the uneducated and/or ultra religious thought the Earth was flat and the center of the Universe, that demons caused disease, and theat the earth and heavens were constructed in 6 actual days . Well all of this has been shown not to be true as has nearly all of your "theories ". Perhaps it would be best if you actually read some scientific literature, in refereed jornals and read the positions as given by The National Academy of Sciences and The American Association for the Advancement of Science....at the end of the day..it does not matter what you believe  or "know to be true in your heart " from personal incredulity......what does the actual evidence say..?   Like it or don't like it....Science is not a democracy anymore than Nature is ....we as scientists examine how nature is and what laws are fundamental to its operation...not how we wish it to be ..

Answer 5

Wow! it does take some brain to digest all that and form some sensible response! food for thought, indeed! go ahead, you certainly are heading somewhere!

Answer 6

is that an okay theory ??

No, it is a statement of belief, expressed in the form of a jumble of words..

It is only a theory if it is a logical statement that can be tested or that makes predictions about the world that we can test.