Think about it and answer a question for me please? ?

Question

When Y/A members suggested that the baby belonged to the daughter and not the mother, I was very doubtful - but it seems that way to me. In 99% of the pictures the Daughter is holding the baby. And in one introduction, the governor said Bristol is holding "the newborn" - who refers to their baby as "the newborn" - I really don't believe this girl is pregnant folks, I believe she has already had her baby. Why would the father stand clear while his 17 year old "pregnant" daughter is being made to carry this heavy 4 month old baby?

http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2008/0809/bristol_palin_0901.jpg

http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/09/02/PH2008090200261.jpg

http://www.sawf.org/Newsphotos/Entertainment/SarahPalinFamily28Aug08.jpg

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/rt_mccain_palin_080902_mn.jpg

Answer 1

Well, maybe she's pregnant with her second baby, dugh.  Abstinence only, worked for Bristol.  And no, I am serious, it would not surprise me at all if that is her baby, and she is pregnant with her second.

Answer 2

useless question don't need answer

Answer 3

please stop spreading propaganda

Answer 4

Ehh, now that would be a major scandal, but i don't believe it. I think they make her carry the baby because they wanted to cover her belly

Answer 5

Your opinion might ring a bell for the democrats whose main issues is reviving Sodom and Gomorrah, which encourages everyone to have s*x anytime and anywhere they like, then undergoes abortion.

Answer 6

my question is.....how long was mccain gonna wait to tell his voters.

Answer 7

Surely you have something better to do with your time than this.

Answer 8

Thought about it..

Wow.. just wow!

YA wont allow me to say more.

Answer 9

Too bad my vote is for McCain, no matter what!

Nice try!

Next....

Answer 10

hmmm thats a good point

Answer 11

That is the poorest question since "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"

Answer 12

does it really matter ? do any of you dems have a heart ? ok if its true ! could anyone out there begin to think maybe palin is trying to protect her daughter and grandchild , think about it ya idiots , what purpose would palin have for accepting redicule if she werent the mother ? do you think she is stupid and wouldnt know it would be found out ? so one of two things , bristol is the mother and palin is trying to protect her from just what you are all doing to her anyway , or palin is the mother and guess what bristol loves that baby the same as alot of older sisters do and has mothering instincts going on , get over it and find something to do with the issues we are facing as a nation to bicker and redicule about .

Answer 13

Nope not true... And can we please come up with some new questions... Are you dems that scared she will win? And she will and these stupid smears will help her win...

Answer 14

Well the baby is the newest edition to the family and is approx 5 months a lot of people would consider that a newborn.  I think she is pregnant and she was holding the baby to hide her baby bump.  If you look back at the announcement speech she is holding the baby a great deal of the time.  I think that was intentional.  The fact that they were trying to hide her bump during that speech makes me loose a great deal of respect for Sarah and her husband.  If they were to have come out about it during that speech I bet that it wouldn't be as big of an issue as it is now.  I did see some of the pictures of the family taken earlier this year Sarah does not appear to be pregnant at all.  I wouldn't be surprised if this wasn't the last we've heard about the Palins.  

Answer 15

Yep, the supposed miscarriage is planned for the upcoming month.  They really think we are stupid.

Answer 16

Yes, agreed.

I have a feeling in about a month, we can expect to see Bristol "miscarry" or otherwise "lose" the baby.

However, the election will be over by then, and when she does "miscarry", if anyone dares question it, they'll immediately be attacked for being "insensitive".

If this wasn't a secret, then why was Bristol mysteriously taken out of school for 8 months? And why did it take bloggers snooping around to get Palin to own up to the pregnancy, instead of it being known from day one? Not even the people in her hometown knew about it.

That tells me that if they were being secretive about a pregnancy now, they were capable of hiding it then.

And how weird is the "Well since you asked, she wasn't pregnant then, but she is now?" story? I mean, really...what a giant coincidence!

Something is just not right with this story.

Answer 17

Now it's proven: (many) dems have no brain.

Answer 18

Use your brain.  If Trig was born in April, Bristol could not be 5 months preg if in fact Trig was hers.  

Answer 19

You make up lies about that poor girl.  So what if the is her 6 baby?  Is it any business of yours?  Why do you care?  Check out the truth about Baracka Obama and you won't be worried about the s*x life of a 17 year old girl who has no relation the the campaign whatsoever!!!

Answer 20

The only thing I can say is:  I'm happy to know that "The Palin Family" is Human and can make mistakes like any other average family.  God shine his light on all;  The Good, Bad, Evil, the Rich and the Poor. We all fall short of our outcomes.

Answer 21

I seriously don't care.

There is a war in Iraq, the global climate is f****d up, the economy is down. Why should the baby (or babies) of that poor girl bother me.

Answer 22

That is a very interesting theory.