Let's say that your husband looks like a celebrity.If your husband asked you would you had still married him if he didn't look like someone famous,is this a good answer?It's long but he's a good listener.
It depends because what you might find ugly,I might find beautiful.I married you for more than just your looks.I still feel that you have to have some sort of physical attraction to a person to make things work.So as long as I was still attracted to you and love you then yes,I would had married you.You don't have to look like someone famous for me to had married you.Let's face it,you're not going to look like this forever,I'm not going to look like this forever.If the lead singer of my favorite childhood band had blue eyes and blonde hair and I thought it was hot then seeing you with blue eyes and blonde hair is hot too.But to be honest,even if you had brown eyes and black hair,you'd still be hot.Like I said I had other boyfriends before we got married that didn't look anything like a celebrity but they were fairly good looking and I still dated them.But the reason why they're my exs is because they didn't have the personality that I was looking for.You had looks and personality.
Would he be mad if he heard this answer?Would he want a divorce or something?
One more thing.If you would have married a person despite the fact that they had really really long hair or a wrinkle here and there,does that mean that you didn't marry them because they look like someone famous and that you married them for more than just their looks.
His looks are one reason of why you married him but it's not the only reason.
There was this band that I used to like and he looks like the lead singer.Shouldn't it be a compliment that he looks like someone that I used to be a fan of?Isn't his looks part of who he is even though he looks like someone else?
Does it get the point out?Does it sound good.It's honest.
Tags: