Question:

This is probably a pointless question but.....?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

If The Undertaker were to go to TNA, would he be allowed to use The Undertaker gimmick? Is it owned by wwe and would he have to wrestle under a different name?

BTW: I know that Undertaker would never go to tna, but I just like the idea of a Sting Vs Undertaker clash!!!

 Tags:

   Report

3 ANSWERS


  1. They might let him keep his gimmick, but i highly doubt WWE would let him keep his name "The Undertaker",

    And what would The Undertaker without his name? you couldn't call  him "Mark Calaway" ....LOL

    i think Sting Vs Undertaker Vs Kane Vs Abyiss in a HIAC match would be awesome


  2. vince owns all naming rights and anything that relates to the name...a couple may have the rights..like hogan, but he even had to strike a deal to get it back.  notice the "rock" now goes by dwayne johnson instead of the rock.

  3. Yes, he would have to change it, since its a copyright of WWE or TNA can pay WWE everytime he uses the gimmick...

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 3 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.