Three scramble matches at Unforgiven....?

Question

Q: Do you think that's overkill?

Should they have just kept it at one, 3 might make it repetitive.

Answer 1

Yes it's definitely overkill especially as WWE are hyping the Scramble matches as unique and special.Having three matches using the same format is too repetitive for me.It should have been booked like No Way Out with just the two main matches for the Raw and Smackdown rosters.The lineup for the ECW Scramble that includes Mark Henry, The Miz and Finlay doesn't bode well as Evan Bourne should have been given his chance.

The storyliners have booked these series of matches to further promote ECW on the big stage and give the younger talent the chance to showcase their skills.With luck there should be three decent matches with maybe MVP, Jeff Hardy and Brian Kendrick putting on the match of their careers.WWE should use these gimmick matches positively to give the younger stars a push as they're the future of the company.

Answer 2

no

Answer 3

WQ: Yes they did. Apparently Unforgiven now has championship scramble match as it's gimmick match like Backlash now has elimination chambers and the Royal Rumble has it's traditional 30-man Rumble match.

The match has an interesting gimmick but not one that is entertaining enough to have three of them that stretch over the course of an hour (as each match is 20 minutes.) The only benefit I see is ECW will finally get as much time for their championship match as RAW and Smackdown!

Answer 4

yeah its a gimmick match, thats like having 3 HIAC in one night they are over doing the PPV already..hopefully they dont add anymore gimmick matches cause then it will really over kill the PPV..they should have just used 1 and had SD title match a 5 man battle royal(no over the rope, pin to eliminate) and ECW title match an Extreme Rules match..

Answer 5

yea now thats jus gonna be the whole show  

Answer 6

yeah.

but all 3 will be different.

obviously hhh wins SD's.

henry or hardy , probably hardy wins ECW's.

then you got RAW's. the intriguing one. It'll come down to batista or punk. does punk drop the title to batista after 2 months or has he gotten enough of a positive response to keep the title for a little while longer?

my opinion - punk drops the title to batista. (probably supposed to drop to cena before)

CENA returns in 2-4 months. (SS earilest , RR 09 latest)

Answer 7

one scramble match is overkill. I just don't like the concept. Should have been a cage match, ladder match, hardcore match. That would have been better. It just sounds like an iron man match for 20 minutes.

Answer 8

NO THEY SHOULD ONLY HAVE GOOD MATCHES AND THE SCRAMBLE MATCHES ARE GOOD

Answer 9

Q: Yes, because if its a special match like they say, then why is it happening 3 times..

Too many at once, can kill the impact the match has on the audience.

other q: Yes, they should keep it at 1 for the reason stated above.

Answer 10

Overkill will be if they add a diva scramble, especially since there aren't 5 women in wwe who can put on a match.  They probably added the wwecw scramble to give ppl a bathroom/snack run break.