Too many boxing belts out there or what?

Question

i think it would be a good idea to have an organization start their own boxing federation? there is TOO MANY belts out there. What do you think? who should start one?

Answer 1

If they're already too many belts why the h**l would you want to start another federation ? it would just be more belts.

You need to get rid of some of the current federations and leave just one

Answer 2

Problem is, you'd have one promoter running the boxing world ala Don King. Everyone has that little spot to be cornered and corrupted. Which is what I think Don king dod to the WBA, hence the revolution and introduction of these other useless belts in fashion these days. I like the idea of a single title and one champion in any given weight class. There'd be ligitimate contenders, classic fights and no champ would ever run from an opponent. But the chances are slim that any of that could happen, too much money at stake. The only way it happens is if some of these organisations go defunct or a good boxer cleans up each weight class, ala Roy Jones, B-Hp, Lennox Lewis, etc!

Answer 3

When someone cleans up the division it should just become one belt that is fought for after that

Answer 4

i know there are a lot of belts that we respect as world titles but in most divisions even though there is normally more than one title holder people know who the true champion is, for example kelly pavlik is the recignized middleweight champ even though abraham has a belt, i think this is a good thing because what it normally does is set up major fights between the title holders to determin the undisputed champ which is good for boxing in the way that it gives the fans something to look forward to and when the fights are made it gives fans what they want