I'm planning on transferring to UCLA in Fall 09 or Fall 2010. Since I'm doing a Biological Science major, I wont be able to complete all the courses before I transfer in Fall 09, so unfortunately I will have to push it back to one entire year. I hear it is common to transfer in 3 years vs. 2 years, but I'm not sure if this is a myth or a fact...
Does this mean I will be applying as a senior to UCLA? Or a junior? (if it takes 3 years)... And is it advisable to spread out my classes more so I am able to take harder classes over a longer period of time? I want to take honors classes so if I transfer in 2010 this gives me a chance to do well in my harder classes.
Also, my GPA is pretty low (3.2) but I am positive I will be able to raise it to around 3.5... Is this competitive enough for UCLA bio major? Do I stand a chance?!?! Any help is much appreciated :)!
Tags: