Trees are meant to be used if replaced, so what is the big deal if all trees aren't saved?

Question

Trees are meant to be used if replaced, so what is the big deal if all trees aren't saved?

Answer 1

As long as they are replaced with new trees, nothing is wrong with it...

Younger trees process more CO2 into oxygen, than old growth trees anyway....

Answer 2

well first of all the animals habitats and we wont have enough air to breathe because the trees take in the carbon dioxide

Answer 3

Because if we use too many then more are being used than replaced, wich is harmful to our animals and enviorment.

Answer 4

Depends on the trees.

You're right about trees on a tree farm in Oregon.

Trees in a rain forest or an "old growth" forest aren't easily replaced.  Once they're cut down, the whole ecology changes.

Answer 5

Hello?  They filter the air and produce OXYGEN for us to BREATHE!

Last time I checked, oxygen was a necessity!

Answer 6

Trees are a renewable energy... We should grow them on mass farms and use them instead of coal.

Answer 7

Well for the obvious reasons that others have mentioned.  I also happen to think that trees are more beautiful then anything you can possibly make with them.  I say leave them alone.

Answer 8

because trees put oxygen in the air that u breathe and help the environment by giving animals food and homes.  

u can care less it theres no trees as long as u care less if u breathe.