Tri Nations or Six Nations?

Question

Which is the best competition?

Answer 1

The Six Nations has got better since Wales got the Grand Slam as Italy and Scotland have also improved; but Tri-Nations hasn't got enough matchs. Perhaps if they expand it to the whole of the southern hemisphere Argentina or a Pacific Island team would join and would enhance the competion.

So the way it's going I'd have to say Six Nations.

Answer 2

Tri Nations but that's only cuz i support the all blacks.

Answer 3

got to be tri nations

Answer 4

six nations more games and more to win for

Answer 5

Since Italy joined the competition now called the six nations they have steadily improved. If they have improved for the next competition then they could cause an upset.

They may not win it this time but they could take points from other teams to cause an upset.

Promises to be a good 6 nations this season.

Answer 6

Tri Nations, way more expancive than the Six Nations

Answer 7

Tri Nations!!!! I hope you are talking about Union but Tri is the best, South, New and Aust. all competing, the three best teams in the world! GO AUSTRALIA!!! even though NZ already won it!!!

Wow, rugby is my life garrrrrrr.....!!!!

Peace

-Wallabies!

Answer 8

6 nataions without a doubt

Answer 9

Tri nations everytime. It's awsome!!!!!!!!

Answer 10

tri nations although six nations offers a bit more variety what with having 6 teams

Answer 11

Tri Nations by far

Answer 12

As a English fan, definitely the Six Nations. Maybe the winner of the Tri Nations could play the winner of the Six Nations every year.

Answer 13

Tri Nations for entertainment and flair

Six Nations for more teams with possibility to win it

Answer 14

TRI NATIONS HAS FEWER GAME BUT THE QUALITY AND RIVALRY IS MUCH HIGHER

Answer 15

Six nations - the competition is different everytime.  I think its Ireland's turn to win in 2007!

Answer 16

I dunno

Answer 17

both are different, i think they both have qualities and neither are better than the other

Answer 18

6 Nations.

Simply because there are more games & the outcome is by no means a foregone conclusion.

Although I have to say the std of Southern Hem Rugby is fantastic, England are still World Champions.

Believe me For a Welshman to say that it takes a lot!!!

The Southern Hemi Guys can certainly be beaten, remember Wales v Austrailia. Now how about bringing in the other European Nations and making a real spectacle of it. Then the Tri- Nations could invite the Islands etc.... Bring it on... Anybody got any tickets?

Answer 19

You cant really compare the two with each other. But i you look at the world rankings you would say the Tri Nations is the better competition.

All Blacks {Tri Nations}

France {Six Nations}

South Africa {Tri Nations}

Australia {Tri Nations}

Ireland {Six Nations}

England {Six Nations}

Scotland {Six Nations}

Argentina

Wales {Six Nations}

Samoa

Answer 20

Six-nations

Answer 21

six nations, it is more honest, we in the northers hemisphere play rugby because we enjoy it not because we are getting paid big bucks .

Answer 22

Stylistically they are totally different tournaments because of the teams they are composed of.  The Tri-Nations have more speedsters and running tries but thats becasue the teams put an emphasis on that.  The Northern teams put more of an emphasis on set peices.  Although France and SA make exceptions to those rules.

In terms of entertainment value, I'd have to say the Tri-Nations are more entertaining, with bigger rivalries and more intensity due to the shorter season.

Answer 23

the six nations becouse you have six teams and one chance to beat each although i think the rugby is better in the tri nations the six nations is the better competition.