Do you think this is ethical? I was reading this book, (Skeptoid - Brian Dunning) and he raised the idea that trying to prove the existence of God (people trying to find the remains of Noah's Ark etc) isn't right as it removes faith. Trusting blatant scientific fact or 'proof' isn't the same as trusting in a God. Where would you draw the line? Do you think any argument's for the existence of God are unethical? Pascal's Wager, The argument from design? Are they unethical because they try to reason for a belief in God, is this better or worse than having blind faith?
Tags: