Question:

U can't b serious, Charles would make a good king of england.?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

U can't b serious, Charles would make a good king of england.?

 Tags:

   Report
Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

31 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date  |  Rating

  1. All you know about him is what you've read in Mr Murdoch's papers.  Murdoch has spent most of his life slagging off the British royal family.  I think he wants to be queen.

    The monarchy is our only defence against corrupt or loony politicians.  Our present queen (God bless her) does not feel it is her duty to intervene.  If Charles had been king, Blair would not have been able to send British troops into Iraq.


  2. He won't be worse then Bush

  3. "Good" is fairly subjective.

    Personally, I think he would make an "interesting" monarch since he has made it clear on a number of occasions that he would like to be more involved in issues that help the average Briton in parliament.

    Needless to say this has brought the main political parties out in a cold sweat.

    As others have pointed out, he did far more charitable work than Diana ever did, but he only got grief for it.

    Camilla would not be queen, as she herself has said, but would be the consort as Prince Philip is to the Queen.

    I think "King Charles" (or George VII as he will probably take as his name, in tribute to his grandfather) will be a progressive monarch and be a good lead into his son, William, probably a more popular choice,sadly.

  4. He's good at l*****g the posteriors of Muslims.

  5. Hes the only person we've got that's been trained to be the King

  6. well, what ever someone thinks of this , He will be King. So what r u gonna do.

  7. Sorry to be pedantic.  He wouldn't be King of England.  Wales, Ireland, Scotland and myriad other places would have to tolerate his eccentricities too.  I agree the the monarch does not seem to do much but since we are currently subject (sic) to a monarchy then Queen Elizabeth II has always been dignified and not an individual the country should be ashamed of.  Charlie?  Waste of space, like his daddy.

  8. Oh h**l no!

  9. Go on, pick someone else then. ha ha ha ha

  10. Wether he would make a good King or not is irrelevant. The fact is unless other events take place he will be the future King. One thing is for certain  I don't think you will ever rise to that title, nor will most people in this country.

  11. We could just scrap the surprisingly foreign monarchy, and put the money into the health system, then it might actually work. It's waste of money to pay for a bunch of foreign inbreds to go around opening new shopping centres.

    Listen to this.....     "The Queen has turned out to be the new owner of a run-down, rat-infested house in a deprived area of east Manchester. "

    Too much power, and they're a waste of space.

  12. he would make a good president a real di*khead!

  13. lol thats true!

  14. And what in the world would he accomplish while the king of england?  He hasn't made a name for himself so far.  Come on, now.

  15. NO NO NO he would make a lousy King, his wife is not suitable as a partner for a king.

    He should stand down and hand it over to his eldest son.

    PC is a pampered, self opinionated bigot.

    He got his wish for a partner at great cost to another human being(s).

    He is an idiot just like his father.

  16. Well he's been an absolutely cr*p Prince of Wales, so england is more than welcome to him. Please just say Wales doesn't have to put up with him as king

  17. My opinion of him went up a lot after watching '50 not out' (a BBC4 program for Stephen Fry's 50th birthday) and finding out that he watched - and loved - Blackadder, which does after all spend a lot of time making fun of his relatives.

  18. Why not, he's been trained for it since birth. He already deputises for the Queen a lot.

  19. How can you have a good or bad king?

    They don't do anything.

  20. I apologize for the ignorant liberals in America who decided to use this question to bash our president when it has nothing to do with our President, it has everything to do with Charles and whether he would be a good King.

    I would like you to know not everyone in America is as ignorant as these liberals who are basically ruining our country with their extremist ideas.

    I also apologize for posting this as it also has nothing to do with Prince Charles becoming the King.

  21. Charitable works, cares about the ecology, proper training - certainly more than W can say.  He'd be a better king - even if the title were not titular - than most of the presidents elected into office.

  22. I've never said any such ridiculous thing - Charlie Chumpface wouldn't even make a good king in a pack of playing cards!

  23. I'm an American so I really can't comment.  It seems a matter for the Brits.  His PR is not very good but I can't judge if he would be qualified.

  24. Charles has been training for the job for 60 years. As his mother could last another twenty years if she follows her mother, it is unlikely that Charles's rule will be for very long. Even so, if he is still alive when the Queen dies, he deserves his time as King. He will make an excellent king of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and various other countries that retain the monarchy.

    If we have to have a King (I would rather Australia was a republic), I have no problem with Charles and his Queen, Camilla.

  25. You are forgetting, that your throne is only a symbol. If he smiles at the right time and shakes hands, he will be accepted.For more scandals he is too old anyway.

  26. Name me ONE good king of England,just one who has not been a leacherous murdering swine.Later dates i know never been caught yet mybe,but before the law ment them aswell they stole and murder even there own to get power,i wonder do a zebra wash off its stripes and say im a horse ?

  27. He'd be such a good king, as GWB is a good president.

  28. I don't think it would matter one way or the other. What does the Queen do anyway? She's just a figurehead so if Charles is the figurehead, what would it matter? One figurehead is like the next.

  29. Charles is vilified because he is an eccentric.  However, though he has his faults he is basically a kind man and cares deeply for this country.  Look at the good the Prince's Trust has done.  Don't believe everything that you read in the Republican Murdoch Press or the ridiculous stories about him which were generated by the sainted Princess Diana.  Perhaps many of you are too young to remember that he was popular before he married Diana.

    Please try and be fair.  There are always two sides to every argument.

  30. Can you seriously say it matters anymore? what was the last important thing that the monarchy did. Dont get me wrong I dont want to get rid of them they are great for tourism and keeps the paparzzi away from others but appart from that does it matter which one heads the mockery sorry monarchy

  31. How hard can it be to be a Queen or King these days? Where can they go wrong when they do nothing all day!
You're reading: U can't b serious, Charles would make a good king of england.?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 31 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Register Now
Unanswered Questions