Question:

UCLA and Michigan.both have new coaches ,so they can compete with USC & OSU who get better first?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Both Michigan or UCLA have no QB's.But it looks Like UCLA could be better.

 Tags:

   Report

11 ANSWERS


  1. if ucla plays like they did the second half of than tennessee game, they could stand a pretty good chance of beating usc for sure


  2. UCLA is better.

  3. as of now, ucla is better! after all, they beat tennessee and michigan lost to the utes!

  4. michigan's terrible, UCLA's definitely better.  O H !!!  

  5. I would give it to UCLA but Go Buckeyes

  6. I bleed maize and blue,but things are not looking petty.I just hope rich doesnt mess up our 33 bowl appearances.It could happen.His high octane offense had no octane.Michigan had no spark Sat.Ucla def has better coaching with Norm chow.How ucla does depends on which Qb shows up.the 4 interception or the secon half Qb.I dont see ucla being a powerhouse.Maybe UT isnt as good as we thought they were going to be

  7. UCLA's Coaching staff could be better from top to bottom.

    After watching them beat Tenn last night i think there on a faster track than Michigan is.Both teams could finish around .500.

    Give them both 2 or 3 years ,they will be very good teams

  8. UCLA is definitely in better shape than Michigan at the moment. That loss to Utah isnt a great way to usher in the Rich Rod era. I dont know if the name Michigan holds the same status as it used to.

    UCLA is on the upswing, and I think Michigan may be eroding. I still dont think the Wolverines are over thier loss to Appalachian State, in my opinion. No matter what the team says, no matter what the fans say, Michigan is not over the App State loss. Heck as a Buckeye fan I still cant digest the Florida loss, but thats of a different nature.

    That loss to the Mountaineers sent Michigan football back, and I mean it sent them back far. I have no idea whats going on in Ann Arbor, they dont develop players the way they used to, they cant seem to keep up with the constantly changing game of football, and they still dont have any semblance of an offense.

    UCLA is way ahead of Michigan, and will likely win a conference title before Michigan wins the Big Ten, even though both teams winning their respecive conferences is highly unlikely with USC and OSU around.

  9. UCLA has a good defense, and I think once that kid gets a little confidence going, he will be a good QB. Michigan has a defensive line, and that is about all they have going for them.

  10. I don't think OSU deserves to be mention along USC.

    anyway,

    USC

    OSU

    UCLA

    MICH

  11. I will always be a Michigan fan, but I think that UCLA will outshine them this year.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 11 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions