Usain Bolt, i dont understand?

Question

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/aug/18/olympics2008.olympicsathletics

is it saying his a drug cheat or what?

Answer 1

It is about the history of the 100m, not Bolt himself.

MANY of the past winners have later been found to be cheating.

It is a cursed event.

Answer 2

Yeah...that's what he's saying.

Answer 3

No, its just another reporter trying to get his story published by saying "suppose...." and "what if...." without any hard evidence whatsoever.

Another stupid article written by another stupid journalist

Answer 4

no the article is just saying that with the skepticism surrounding modern athletics (especially track and field) the public is waiting for the test to come back negative. The article even pointed out "He has already been tested at least six times since he arrived in China," leading me to believe that the journalist feels that Bolt will not be adding to the list of banned sprinters.

Answer 5

This is the paranoia of the Olympics and most other sports.  Everyone wants to rejoice and cheer for this splendid athlete, but until that test says "negative" (no drugs) everyone will hold their collective breaths.  It was worded a touvh confusingly.

Answer 6

Can you read? It's saying that he turned up negative for drugs. It's talking about how much of a skeptic everyone is about the athletes and the fact that there may be drugs much more advanced than the test.

Answer 7

No,it is not. It is saying that only after the results of his drug test come back will everybody know the truth. I believe Bolt is clean.

Answer 8

Yeah, it's saying we have to wait and see which athletes were the ones using steroids.  The article has a point.  Bolt was lightning quick.

Answer 9

He's on drugs- they ALL ARE....Remember how many times Marion Jones tested positive while she was on drugs right? ZERO