Most of us have a clue as to what the VP does. But what if we are on the brink of electing a VP nominee that has no clue as to what the VP does? What would happen if that VP became President? Isn't that a concern to voters? Shouldn't it be? Shouldn't we be researching the VP? Please read the quoted passage below concerning this issue. Thanks!
"Asked about rumors the Alaska governor was being considered as McCain's running mate, she told CNBC: "As for that VP talk all the time, I'll tell you, I still can't answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I'm used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we're trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question."
"Working real hard"? Doesn't the University of Idaho require its graduates to learn English? Does she know that she isn't running for VP of Alaska? Or that the VP presides over the Senate? With the nation facing enormous economic, political and military challenges, do we need another numbnut in the White House? "
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20080904/cm_ucru/sarahpalinqueenofthenobodies
Tags: