Question:

WCE star gets only 5 weeks is that fair?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Kerr gets 5 what a joke

AFL has to get harder on teams that

that are not there to play the game fairly

 Tags:

   Report

4 ANSWERS


  1. Yes it is.I think the problem is caused by continuous bad umpiring. To many players are retaliating against scragging .How many times was Kerr held without the ball and knocked down behind play.At least thirty. I disagree with his behaviour. But the AFL umpires have there favourites which are mainly forwards.If  Franklin and Fevola were being held  continuously and then ignored by umpires they would not kick as many goals as they do. The AFL will not fix the problem because crowds love goal kickers. Umpires should be penalised and scrutinised just like players If they were rubbished in the news and put in front of a tribunal and rubbed out they might gain respect and an understanding of the games rules and in force them .this is not just a problem with 1 or 2 teams . We all see it .  Enjoy the rest of the season


  2. mmm I dunno 5 weeks is pretty hard maybe a couple more could be better but still...

  3. 5 is fair. Its was nothing much. Remember they just dealt with barry hall so this was nothing. Still 5 weeks is a hefty amount of time still. Without his bad record I reckon kerr would only have copped 3

  4. You better change that to 3 weeks, he has accepted the 3 weeks instead of challenging the charge and risking 5. he knows he done it, it's good to see blokes admitting what they done and accepting it, (hall,as well).

    3 weeks is fairly lenient considering it was a head butt that used to be frowned upon.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 4 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.