WWE vs TNA!!!!DIFFERENCES HELp?

Question

Point the Differences want good explanations please

Answer 1

WWE

WWE is definately at his best at the moment with some great storylines,Great fueds(HBK/Jericho or Edge/Undertaker) and great matches.They ve Good announcer (even Grisham is far superior than West and i cant remember the name of that half bald guy) and far fan base.They ve some great performers like Undertaker,edge,Jericho HBK and many more.IMO WWE is the superior than TNA

TNA

When it started it was Total Nonstop Action and now on 2008 it is Total Nonsense Action.They ve great roster with some great talent like Angle,Styles, Daniels(not that poo man) ,Young(not that stupid Super Eric),Kaz ,Dutt and many more.But what they lacks is storyline,Stupid gimmicks and worst gimmick matches witheven stupid stipulations on them and most importantly their announcers (they really pissed me off)due to them I ve to mute my TV (if I wants to see TNA)They r repeating matches on every episode of TNA and in PPV and if this not enough than they put multi man tag match in this.The only thing in TNA which is better than WWE is their women and tag team divison.(not to mention their MMA/Fake S***y match)

So IMO WWE is far far far far far *100 superior than TNA

Answer 2

WWE- bigger fan base, bigger arena's, more talent, mostly acting/talking, old company, worldwide business, 3 shows (raw, sd, ecw), owns WcW. Wrestlemania a huge event in the history of Wrestling.

TNA- smaller fan base, growing very fast, alot of GREAT TALENT, 10-12 WWE superstars moved on to TNA, smaller arenas, good ppvs, more action, Some WcW guys moved on to TNA rather then WWE ie Sting Styles Nash etc