WWF Attitude Era? ?

Question

Is the Attitude Era overrated and need to stay dead or the best dam wrestling you seen.

what's your opinion.

To me it was what got me into wrestling and they wasn't scared to take risk like every one had a Passion to making the business the best it is.

WQ:Does WWE need more stables.

Answer 1

it is overrated. u people want that era back, but u people complain about cena, batista always being champions so y always want wwe to be attitude era.

Answer 2

The only thing that made the attitude era special was the fact that when the WWF went into their 35 min without a match c**p you could turn the channel to WCW.

No. More tag teams.

Answer 3

The Attitude Era was more promos than wrestling. you were lucky if u got 20 mins of wrestling. every time after a match there was a promo. promos arent wrestling. it was very overrated.

wq-yes stables can make the wwe interesting. if you have good pairs.  

Answer 4

It wasnt good enough to me. i think it needs to stay down.

Answer 5

I see you're so used to trolling that you instinctively put a worthless "WQ" for this question, even though if you were a legitimate user you wouldn't need to since it's already a wrestling question. Nice try, troll.

Answer 6

...Best d**n wrestling ever seen it owns this crappy superhero Cena era.

WQ- Yes, they may get a Evolution (rip-off) stable with Batista and Randy Orton, but that's a rumor.

Answer 7

The WWE has way too much drama in it right now, for example the limo blowing up, the million dollar mania, the thing with vicky and edge COME ON!!