Was 9/11 an inside job?

Question

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7BSt9jhxPQ&NR=1

Answer 1

NO!

Answer 2

Yes. The evidence of foreknowledge and complicity is clear. It is not conspiracy theory. It is conspiracy fact.

There are criminal elements inside the government. Most people in the government were honestly deceived.

Answer 3

God no. 9/11 was orchestrated by Al-Qaeda.

Quite frankly, the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 are insulting to our nation, our soldiers, and the people who died in the twin towers. The Bush regime is not without flaw, but it stops short of genocide.

Answer 4

Yes, the pres. and cia had to of known about it before it was going to happen.

Answer 5

No... it was an outside job done by mostly Saudis and orchestrated by Al Qaeda which has its roots in  Afghanistan.

Answer 6

I dont know who the h**l knows

Answer 7

Involvement of people in positions of power in the 9-11 attacks is not theory. It could correctly be called "theory" only in the absence of evidence. An abundance of evidence exists suggesting that people in power had foreknowledge, were complicit, had motive, had opportunity, and gained from 9-11. In law enforcement that is called a "case", not a theory.

In the 9-11 case the evidence is sufficient to convene a grand jury. Evidence becomes "proof" only when the jury at trial decides it proves the case. The problem with the 9-11 case is the court (the 9-11 Commission) was rigged in favor of the criminals and it chose to exclude all evidence of guilt.

Learn more about the evidence. Start with the web site for Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice (don't confuse it with Scholars for 9-11 Truth -- the names and URLs are similar).

http://stj911.org/

and their publication site, Journal of 9-11 studies

http://www.journalof911studies.com/

When reading about 9-11, beware of COINTEL web sites. COINTEL sites are propaganda sites staged by government but pretending to be otherwise. Either they parrot the official propaganda or they spread false theories aimed at throwing you off trail and setting you up for ridicule. I observed a couple of strange sites appearing frequently in answers here. One was WWW-DEBUNKING911.com, the other was WWW-WEBSKEPTIC.WIKIDOT.COM. I asked questions about them and received some interesting answers.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

If you conclude the government's official fairy tale is a lie, do not feel compelled to justify that view by subscribing to theories about how the 9-11 attacks were done. The official explanations for the collapse of the towers, what exactly struck the Pentagon, etc, are not credible based on the evidence. Alternate hypotheses arise to fill the abyss. While the alternate hypotheses are interesting and often more logical than the official hypotheses, is not necessary to "believe" any of them to hold the view that the official explanation is a web of lies. That stands on its own and it is enough to warrant a new and impartial investigation.

The onus is not on the truth seekers to prove the case. The onus is on the government to provide its case, which it has not done.

My view is that if Arab terrorists were involved  in the attacks then they did not act alone. Criminals inside and above the government were involved. The government itself would not murder 3,000 of its own citizens but criminals in positions of power would, and did.

Could something so large be covered up? Easy. Remember on September 10, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld announced $2.3 trillion missing from Pentagon money. Divide $2.3 trillion to find out how many people could be involved.

Answer 8

No, the people who think that are the ones who sit in their yard all day searching for aliens.