Was 9/11 fake or not?

Question

Lets see you could start with Larry Silverstein who had just signed a 99 year lease on the whole WTC complex with Insurance specifically covering acts of terror.

Or how about the 1.8 billion in gold stored under the towers of which they only recovered 230 million.

Maybe the Patriot Act which strips the Bill of Rights bare and never would have passed without the pretext of 9/11, incidentally it was like a 1000 page document that was ready in a few days and was put to a vote before almost anyone in Congress had a chance to read it.

The administration had been talking about ways to invade Iraq as soon as Bush took office.

d**k Cheney has made all his money through Halliburton which has made an absolute killing supplying our troops for the last 5 years. And yes despite his previous public denials, he still has stock.

How many reasons do you want?

He instantly appointed guys that make all their money off of war when he became president and you can't find a motive for 9/11 in that? Coming out of one of the longest periods of peace and prosperity this country has known?

Really?

They should've done their research on the Bush family to know what the american community was doing. They wanted a war and the got one.

People inside the WTC at the bottom floor said the heard loud bangs and the walls shifting BEFORE the plane hit as if mini bombs inside the walls were going off.

The steel shouldnt have been melted by airplane fuel.

What about the giant whole in the pentagon?

How does a Boeing 757, constructed from lightweight aluminum, penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced concrete with piercing clean round holes, and leave no evidence of itself? A 757 Did this? ...if it wasn't so horrific, it would be laughable. Oh wait it is cus no one died sicnce there WAS NO 747 haha

Why did the pentagon take the surveilance taped from across the gas station outside if the cameras outside facing the pentagon wouldve show CLEARLY the "plane" that hit it.

Your rebuttal?

Answer 1

I think the u.s. planed 9/11..lol

Answer 2

My rebuttal -

You are a kook.

Answer 3

im gonna skip all the political stuff and move onto the bomb stuff idk maybe it would be alittle LOUD if a plane was flying that low duh "is that a bomb? oh wait thats just a hugeF***ing airplane about to crash into me i could see how it would sound like an explosion and whose to say the steel even melted the plane crashed into a side of a F***ing building this is the worst question with the stupidist facts ive ever read

Answer 4

Occam's Razor.

Either:

A) Huge conspiracy theory that the government blew up it's own buildings just for free reign to invade countries

B) Some pissed off muslims attacked us

Also, do you really think that that ape that we call a president could do that?

Answer 5

Conspiracy theorists give me the creeps. Are you off your meds?

Answer 6

Ask the people who lost loved ones there. It was very real.

Answer 7

My rebuttal?

Four planes and a war.

Answer 8

I am probably one of the most anti-Bush folks you will ever see here, but I don't buy the conspiracy non-sense. For one thing, our government just isn't that competent. Furthermore, for a conspiracy like that to work would take literally dozens of people keeping their mouths shut this entire time - without ONE of them selling out to the highest paying tabloid. Sorry, I just don't buy it.

Answer 9

September 11, 2001, saw the three buildings in New York City come down at free fall speed in to their own footprints.   We were told that Muslim extremists attacked the United States "because they hate our freedoms".  Does that make any sense?  

Who benefited from the 9/11 attacks?

George W. Bush enjoyed an immediate surge in popularity and the burying of investigative reports on electoral fraud by his brother Jeb's Republican election machine in Florida. "United We Stand" slogans propagated across the nation as Bush boasted of "smoking out" the terrorists.

Rudolph Giuliani became an instant hero by immediately appearing for photo ops as the hands-on mayor at Ground Zero, and by taking command of the situation. He was exalted as Man of the Year by Time magazine while he managed the largest evidence destruction operation in history.

The new War on Terror would become the umbrella for whole new levels of pork, unaccountability, and corruption in the nexus of government and industry that would fight the war.

The weapons industries prepared for a new orgy of corporate welfare, as the Pentagon budget would be further bloated. Certainly we would need billion-dollar stealth bombers to smoke the elusive Osama bin Laden out of his cave.

Vice President Cheney's company, Halliburton, would soon be getting fat no-bid contracts to rebuild the infrastructure that American bombs would destroy in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The owner of the World Trade Center complex would receive a $3.6 billion payout for the destruction of the seven buildings, and would seek a second payout on the basis that the attack was two "occurrences" (because there were two plane crashes). Silverstein Properties had just acquired a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center, and a new insurance policy, in July of 2001. Silverstein would be rid of tthe Twin Towers with their obsolete office space and asbestos abatement problems.

But you may ask if Bush is smart enough to plan the attacks.  He did graduate from Yale University.  So he's got some intelligence.  And he also had Cheney, Rove, and Rice under him.  That's plenty of brainpower.  

And the reason no one has come forward about 9/11 is that Bush is still in office.  He still has the power to make people disappear.  And as long as Bush remains in office, no one will come forward for fear of reprisal.  

Lastly, when people say "Support Our Troops",  they mean don't criticize the war (occupation) in Iraq.  

Answer 10

I just don't understand how a plane crash can cause a whole building that had strong support so if a plane did crash into it, it wouldn't have collapsed and that their was absolutely no evidence of the plane or what ever else they could investigate on.

It looks exactly like controlled demolition to me.

Answer 11

1) 911 was real, planes hitting the towers were very real

2) the lack of investigation is very real

3) the discraction created by those who talk about remote control planes and missles - is very real - as i think they are simply askin the wrong question, one which drives away interest in uncovering the truth

The questions that investigation should start with is

1) who benefits

2) did the government know about a coming attack

3) did the government know about terrorists here

4) did the government know about the hijacked planes

5) why is binladen not wanted for 911 , no mention of 911 on his fbi most wanted page

6) what laws passed after 911, that could not have passed before

7) was the patriot act written before 911?

8) was a iraqi invasion planned before 911?

Real questions, some could indicate conspirators in the administration. But talk of remote control planes and hologram missles discredits ANY dissent.