Was Bush II's administration more corrupt than Reagan/Bush I admin? (Iran/Contra, etc.)?

Question

In terms of Investigations, Indictments, scandals (bribery and gifts, torture, plame leak, wmd etc.) did this administration out do the old school corrupt presidencies?

Answer 1

Reagan/ Bush was linked only to iran contra for awhile. But Reagan was the last of the really great presidents! everyone after is a wannabe! I agree with rope! You didnt feel uncertainty with Reagan/Bush as you did with administrations their after!

Answer 2

i think they all came from the same breeding ground and called the plays from the same playbook~!

Answer 3

At least 1 trillion dollars wasted, 4300 lives, and 35000 our soldiers disabled, millions of Iraqi's dead, our debt 9+ trillion and you have the nerve to ask that question?     A runaway private secret government, destruction of our constitution and bill of rights "so taht they can protect us", and you have the nerve to ask that question?  

Read Ron Paul's  "Revolution a Manifesto", and ask that question again.

Answer 4

The name Bush is synonymous with corruption

Answer 5

yes by far reagan and bush I were real conservatives i disliked their politics but they were not vile and corrupt like JR. I think real conservatives should be enraged that Reagan is in Spirit tied to this visionless rubbish

Answer 6

By far.  This is the most corrupt administration since Nixon.

Answer 7

Yes,absolutely.

Don't forget the new problem with the Justic Department hiring lawyers who are Republicans while turning down lawyers who are Democrats

Answer 8

During Reagan, the issues were better brought into the open and presented on CSPAN, as opposed to the Bush I or Bush II eras.

Reagan deserves alot of credit for that; government disclosure.

Answer 9

Reagen and bush were good presidents, and this is a stupid question

-_-

Answer 10

Depends on your point of view.  Clinton's days in the White House weren't exactly a stellar example of decorum and propriety.  

Answer 11

yes much more.