Was Person 9 on the list involved in the decision to amend the contract ?

Question

The report at

http://

www.defence.gov.au/

minister/

1999/

collins.html states:

<<In August 1991, because of the combat system schedule slippage, the contract was amended to provide a two-stage delivery. This was to allow submarine platform trials to proceed in advance of a fully compliant combat system being available.>>

Who wasn't involved in this decision to amend the contract ?

The book "Collins Class Submarine Story: Steel, Spies and Spin" lists key people.

Person 9 on its list of key people is

<<John Batten (Commander RAN), project office; developed Australian industry involvement policy and contract management system for project [2 March 2006]>>

Answer 1

Persons nine was rudimentary to the entire project and any undue observance of this character does a disservice to the entire system and its progress.

Contractual amendments for the purpose of litigating a hypothesis on the assumption that any public awareness enhances the fame and attention for the said person is a contrived manipulations of the sensibilities of the populace and is to be disregarded as such.

Answer 2

person 9 was ok it was person 10 and 11 and 8 that did it