Was the apollo 11 moon landing fake?

Question

Was the apollo 11 moon landing fake?

Answer 1

Which is more probable?

We went to the moon with less computer power than a modern digital watch, and we're going again. Then to Mars and off to Zeta Reticuli.

or

Your government has sold you out and wants to force this on you:

http://www.verichipcorp.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0gXGTcd6...

Check this out:

Lawn furniture or super groovy interplanetary spaceship of the naive 60's?

http://moonmovie.com/images/AS11-40-5922...

(make sure to enlarge in order to really get a good look at American engineering at its finest)

Answer 2

Yes, but we did it for a good cause, right?

Answer 3

No.

Conspiracy theorists seriously need to get a life.

Answer 4

No.  The evidence is overwhelming that they were real missions -- all six successful ones, and one failed attempt.

The people who are trying desperately to explain away all that evidence don't really have any knowledge or qualification in the sciences that apply to their claims.

No qualified photo analyst believes the photos are fake.

No qualified astrophysicist believes there was too much radiation.

No qualified engineer believes the spacecraft or computers couldn't have functioned.

No qualified historian buys the tortured alternate history version.

The conspiracy theorists have no valid technical, scientific, or historical claims, although they are often able to fool laymen briefly into thinking they do.  And very few, if any of them, will submit to a reasoned debate on their claims.

Answer 5

Of course they faked the moon landings!  They did it as part of a huge plot to hide the existence of the massive moon base they have there.  It is currently home to JFK, TuPac Shakur and about 6 million Jewish people.

Answer 6

of course, i think u should look at my other conspiracy theory about the sun just being a big light bulb. i mean, that makes sense.

Answer 7

There is no way they could have been faked. The amount of people that would have to have been in on it would have been astronomical. No way could that many people have kept such a huge secret for so long.  On top of that, the evidence is sitting on the moon! It would eventually be discovered in the future. The final and best reason is that the Soviets and many amateur astronomers tracked the flights' radio signals, and could determine their origin. If they had been faked, don't you think that the Soviets would have been screaming about it to the world press?  

Answer 8

The six Apollo Moon landings are among the best documented events in human history: thousands of pictures, hours of video, nearly half a ton of Moon rocks, and millions of eye witnesses, including myself. There is not a single scientist in the world who doubts that they took place. To deny them is to discredit the magnificent achievement of the team which went to the Moon, and to reveal abysmal scientific ignorance.

Answer 9

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that the moon landings were real, yet not a shred of evidence that they weren't. I have yet to hear a fairly convincing conspiracy theory. If you can come up with any please post them so I can show you how flawed in logic they really are. Perhaps the flag one? Or maybe the shadows. Go out on a ledge and lets talk about radiation.  

Answer 10

lol idk

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2...

watch diz video  

Answer 11

They were fake.

Answer 12

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...

they didn't have the technology to fake it when it happened.... LOL

Answer 13

No, and neither were the other five.  Rather than go into a long spiel, I'll wait and hope you add to your question and give the reasons you might consider that it was faked.  I'll address those individually.

Answer 14

No.

All the so-called evidence of a hoax is based on bad science. For most of the supposed examples you'll see cited, they are based on assumptions, not on knowledge. Misunderstanding photographics used; in the assumption that things we'd see on earth, in an atmosphere directly translate to an airless moon; to statements that are either willfully ignorant, or a flat-out lie.

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxap... is a good site to check out to see some of the charges, and their scientific explaination.

And, use some common sense. Abu Gharib was made public. CIA black sites and rendition was made public. The president getting a BJ was made public. In 40 years, a conspiracy that would have taken tens of thousands of people, no one has actually leaked any information that the mission was faked.

Answer 15

Of course not! Who would be stupid enough to think that?

Answer 16

no no no  no it was not a fake ;are u a fake  i'd be more able to believe you are a fake