Was this a good trade, i traded Larry Fitzgerald and clinton portis for Adrian Peterson and David Bowe?

Question

i have LT on my team to, so i have now both LT and AP, but i have to start Calvin Johnson now that Larry Fitzgerald is gone

Answer 1

Do you mean dwayne bowe,  I am a chiefs fan,  However I would have not traded,  I have fitz on three of my teams.  I love bowe but I dont think that croyle can be protected enough so that bowe can get the ball.  

Answer 2

I think it was a great trade for you and I would have done it for sure.

Answer 3

great trade

Answer 4

If I were the commissioner of that league, I would have vetoed that trade. Don't worry about the lack of top-tier WR. Just keep an eye on the waiver wire and see who develops as a steal about a month into the season. You have LT and AP, who are easily the top two players in Fantasy this year. And, that's why I would have vetoed it. It's not fair for one person to have the top 2 RBs in the league on their team.

In other words, that was such a good trade, I wouldn't have allowed it.

Answer 5

Good if the other guy agrees to it.

Answer 6

I think it would be better to know what other receivers you have now that Fitzgerald is gone.... However, to put it simply, you got fleeced. Fitzgerald=one of the most consistent wide receivers in fantasy and portis is always a good value. Peterson is a huge injury risk, and Bowe has no one throwing to him. You traded a second tier running back and second tier receiver for a top running back and a 5th tier receiver at best. Not smart.

Answer 7

Gud 4 u if AP doesnt have a sophmore slump