Question:

We should limit the extraction of oil?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

For you the speed with which we extract oil is morally acceptable? There is some real risk to the environment and our health or are just conjecture?

p.s. know some relevant study about it?

 Tags:

   Report

8 ANSWERS


  1. "Oil is killing our planet and our country. Proof of global pollution is obvious, as is our ridiculous use of foreign oil. Pointless. We make not like using public transportation, but it's darn cheap. Think about unloading your car, dropping the expensive auto insurance....riding a bike, taking a bus or train to get to work instead. The cost savings to the average home on that alone is staggering. Think of the neat things you could pay off, or purchase for yourself if those bills for cars, gas and insurance were gone? And the side benny? you help save the planet....or at least you go to meet your maker being able to say that you were part of the solution, not the problem.

    That alone is worth a great deal."

    Liberal nonsense for the most part.  Yes pollution is "killing the planet," but we are at the point that regardless of how much Americans, Canadians, and Australians reduce their consumption, China and India will surely negate that tenfold as they continue to consume those resources like a pig at a buffet.  

    You could take public transport, that is if it were not c**p in most major cities and full of the weirdest people.  Unfortunately, the due to the lack of interest in public transport, in many cities it remained under developed and practically useless for most people.  Further, if a lot of people suddenly decided to dispense with using their cars and using pubic transport, the fees will surely rise... supply 7 demand.

    Anyway, I like my car, which is the reason I spent so much money on it.  Its fast, looks good, expensive to service and buy fuel for, and I can give a c**p less that it is.


  2. No to me its not.I think the huge plastic wastes that we make every day are the evidence of it.Recycling all of them is not actually a practical possibility.In a sense the products shouldnt be  provided for us to use in this amount.

    Sorry I dont know a relevant study but take a look at this u should find something http://environment.newscientist.com/home...

  3. No we should not limit the extraction of oil.

    For me the speed in morally acceptable. There is risk to the environment, but acceptable risk.

    There must be many relevant studies, but I don't have any information on them.

  4. The Democrats will not be satisfied with any solution.They prefer that we buy our oil from our Enemy's.

  5. Oil is killing our planet and our country. Proof of global pollution is obvious, as is our ridiculous use of foreign oil. Pointless. We make not like using public transportation, but it's darn cheap. Think about unloading your car, dropping the expensive auto insurance....riding a bike, taking a bus or train to get to work instead. The cost savings to the average home on that alone is staggering. Think of the neat things you could pay off, or purchase for yourself if those bills for cars, gas and insurance were gone? And the side benny? you help save the planet....or at least you go to meet your maker being able to say that you were part of the solution, not the problem.

    That alone is worth a great deal.

  6. I think we have no choice but to get our own gas. The other countrys are doing the same.

  7. Keep taking oil out the ground with out replacing it with a substitute material / fluid for the purpose oil is in the ground originally or be ready to "FRY", if not us definitely our children.

    .

  8. What are you asking?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 8 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.