Well some one has to ask. What about the Irani's faking the photos?

Question

They say on the news the missles don't have near the range they were said to have. Does this negate the Iranian threat?

Answer 1

They are scared, people make mistakes when scared !

Check this out

http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countrie...

Answer 2

Yes, it is very clear that they faked the 4 missile photo.

Answer 3

Yes, the second right one is fake. Anyone can tell the real ones from the fake one. If you use a laptop tilt the screen as much as you can and see that the color effects don't match. There is a difference in the color of the sky, the fake one has a lighter sky background.

I am glad that this will persuade the Iranians to rectify their failures. Had this missile failed during a real firing, it would have been a disaster. The Iranians need to work to make sure that this is not repeated during a live launch. Good for them, they've got their lessons.

Yes, it does negate the Iranian threat. Try attacking them now.

Answer 4

Governments lie and fake things regardless of country. There is not a big Iranian threat. BTW,you posted this in the wrong section,this is Israel travel,also BBC is anti-semitic(according to some users here).

Answer 5

Hi JD,

Nice to hear from you again.

I hope you are doin' fine my man.

OK, here's my little piece of data on the subject:

Them jews care none about those bombs, they are just scared sheetless because of the  SA-20 Triumf system, that's an advanced Russian surface-to-air missile system. Once operational, it will be able to destroy aircraft, cruise missiles, and short- and medium-range ballistic missiles at ranges of up to .......x*x.x*x miles,(LOL! surprise !).

Now the Iranians have ordered about 20 of those babies.

Next week the Russians deliver the first four.

Do you know anything about those toys JD?

One thing I can tell you is that them jews have no antidote for them and the reason for pushing us Americans to tag along ain't no nukes. It's them SA-20s.

If you do not want to believe me, you just go rite ahead and do some googlin' yourself and then come back here and post.

Take care.

Answer 6

hmm.. about those photos.. I was wondering : They actually bought the Photoshop picture editing program or downloaded it for free using Emule?

Answer 7

Hello JD,Indeed I agree with Steel user.

These S-20 missiles are the S-400 modified and upgraded too.

They can use some special cloaking device so they can pass through undetected from any conventional (and unconventional radar system)

The Jews are really worried about them because they are able to hit strategic targets very easily.

Therefore it doesn't really matter if those photos are doctored  by the Iranians because you won't be able to see where they have set the S-20s.

Until now the Jews are alone in this and it's kind of a catch 22 for them because they have not enough aircrafts to do the damage (they need the Americans -tough luck though because G. Bush is leaving the Presidency and has no real power any more) and if they do not hit Iran now, the Iranians within six months will be so well prepared that it will be totally impossible to do it then.

I believe the Iranians are very clever because this was done in good timing.

With the American elections coming and all, I mean.

If you want my opinion,I do not think that the Iranians will hit first. It's against their mentality.

The Jews on the other hand are making so many bad judgment errors so they better stay put if they do not want to provoke the civilized European world.

Regards

Answer 8

It is more Middle Eastern "bluff and bluster" in the absence of "shock and awe". That's all. It does not exactly "negate" the threat...it just confirms what most in the West already knew...that while the threat is limited, it still exists and must be dealt with. Iran is desperate to stall Israel and the U.S. long enough to develop it's nuclear weapons...I hope that they don't succeed.

Personally, I believe that Israel will strike at Irans nuclear facilities either within the next 2 months or else in November or December.

Answer 9

This gives me a sense of relief.

Answer 10

One of the missiles didn't launch . It is the New York Times which analyzed the pictures and came up with what could be the right pictures . from point of view , it is just a move from pro war activists to reduce the fear from these missiles and ridicule the Iranians . by the way ; the Iranians are not the masters of photoshop . the Americans are . what ever happened to these pictures showing Iraqi facilties producing Anthrax ?

Answer 11

No it does not negate the Iranian threat. Some people seem to think this is inter-nation war because that has been only historical battles fought previously. Country A declares war on Country B.

We are in age of beyond national wars of which people in west have been fighting extremism for decades.  Iran Fights wars by proxy for quite some time now, with additionaly national desire for nuclear capability to create a ninth nuclear powerhouse.  So now people only recognize war by missiles and presidential demands?  That is SIMPLISTIC to look at the battle that way.

We have issues with radical extremism of which Iran has chosen to be spokesman. They are still very much a threat, not only to Israel but to the rest of the World:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76STxsWJC...

Answer 12

According to the Debkafile  http://www.debka.com/index1.php   [click on:  "Second round of Iranian ballistic missile tests"   ]

"This was more posture than reality. In fact, only one 2,000-km range Shehab-3 was actually test-fired. However, accentuating the Gulf as the location of the second day’s tests, instead of an inland desert location like the first, raises the threat level."

On the other hand:

"Too many Western analysts look at any adversary through a Western lens .  . .  . My personal history, culture, and investigative journalism work allow me to understand what Westerners cannot see: Iran will attack Israel as soon as it can."

" . . .  The argument that says that Iran will not attack Israel because of immediate and massive retaliation from Israel and the United States is absolutely wrong. The Islamists would welcome such retaliation in order to cement coalitions among Muslim peoples and to encourage riots in the Arab street. " ---Mohamed Sifaoui

http://www.meforum.org/article/1870