Were Obama and Democrats FOR inexperience before they were against it?

Question

they said it would be a breath a fresh air. Unfortunately for them, the Republican breath of fresh are was an F5 tornado that just blew their convention right off the MSM.

Answer 1

The Obamabots don't have the intelligence to know the difference between executive experience and senate experience. They are writing off Sarah Palin's ample experience as a city councilwoman, mayor and the governor of Alaska just because she is a woman, all the while touting Obama's less than one term of senate "experience" where he mostly voted "present" (as in "I was here") instead of voting "yes" or "no". It is sexism pure and simple. They are like sharks attacking her just like they did Hillary. It is disgusting. If it is so easy to become governor of a state, why don't THEY do it??

Answer 2

There are no prerequisites to be president other than age and origin of birth.  Our founding fathers knew that could only benefit our country. Finally it seems that everyone from any walk of life is getting their chance to lead.

Answer 3

I am disappointed in the demorat.  This rant is little better than a school yard taunt.  Why not ask a real question that has a substantive position on issues?  Are conservatives afraid to discuss issues?

This question makes no sense and childish adhominem rants won't accomplish anything worthwhile.

To respond: No they not.

Answer 4

Between being a legislator and senate obama has about 10 year political experience, granted not a great deal but surely it beats the 8 years Regan was Governor of California.

We routinely vote and elect and sometimes highly respect people who haven't spent a lot of time in Washington.

If you are proposing we discount Obama because he hasn't been in the political game all that long than we should disqualify Reagan as being a "great president" as he too was inexperienced when he took office.

Answer 5

Wait for the CAT 5 Gustav that will delay or cause us to ignore the Republican kissy-face.

Which is as it should be.

We can all watch reruns of

"Gidget goes to Washington"

To remember them by.

Answer 6

sure they were, they were all for a women too, but look now how the dem's and the media are trashing sara palin

Answer 7

No, they're still all for an inexperienced President.  They just want the vice president to had a lot of experience.  They seem to like having the blind leading the man who can see.  Bush did that in 2000.