Question:

Were there any differences between the bones of a pauper to that of a king?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Were there any differences between the bones of a pauper to that of a king?

 Tags:

   Report

3 ANSWERS


  1. I think so because the royalty would have gotten the best food available at the time.  The pauper would have not been as fortunate.


  2. Lead or gold fillings.

  3. the pauper may have weakened bones ( due to poorer nutrition) or broken bones that were not set properly ---but that is not a guarantee.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 3 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions