What's better 2 alpines or 1 pioneer?

Question

http://sonicelectronix.com/item_4281_Alpine+SWR-1242D+-TYPE+R-.html

http://sonicelectronix.com/item_9238_Pioneer+Premier+TS-W3001D4.html

going to be powered by this amp

http://sonicelectronix.com/item_6672_Boss+BLX3500M.html

Answer 1

the two alpines be tight. especially with that amp thumpin it. but i bet mines better. 2 jl audio, w7 subs with a jl amp.

Answer 2

i would say go with the 2 alpines. i think alpines are better subs overall.

Answer 3

I Would Go With The 2 Alpines. No Offence But...

''Boss Sucks ***''. That Amp Is Way Overrated! But If It Really Puts Out That Amount You Subs Will Blow Because 1 Of Those Alpines Is 1500 Peak & 500 Rms. So Both Alpines Is 3000 Peak & 1000 Rms.Focus On RMS Not Peak. Peak Doesnt Mean Anything Just Picture It Not There.RMS Counts The More Rms The Better!  If That Amp Happens To Put Out More Than 1000 Rms Say Goodbye To Those Subs. You Wont A Amp That Has The Same Amount Or The Closest Amount Of Rms Power As Your Subs. So Basically You Will Need A Mono Amp That Has 1000 Rms So Each Sub Can Get 500 Rms (Making Them Fully Powered!).

Heres A Mono Amp That Has The Amount Of Power You Will Need.

http://sonicelectronix.com/item_9551_Hif...

P.S: Thanks For Looking On My Fav. Audio Website (www.sonicelectronix.com)

''Hope This Helped!''

Answer 4

if you ask me i would mos def say the alpines, to me pioneers are only good head units ( cdplayer ), but if ur lookin for subs and ur tryin to get somthing good then if i was you i would get some kickers, or rockford fosgates or JL'S them are the best subs