What's the worse punishment:Using a lunchbox as a toilet or using a toilet as a lunchbox?

Question

http://www.myfoxorlando.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=6056091&version=3&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1

Answer 1

Teachers love to play the " no you can't go to the bathroom game" .       I'd would just walk out of the room.

Toilet would be too heavy to carry around as a luncbox.

Answer 2

Well, I'm assuming the poor kid took his lunch out first. That teacher should be done for abuse, it must have been humiliating for him. I used to hate it when teachers would tell kids they should have used the toilet on their lunch break. Obviously they would have if they needed to, what good would it have done him standing in the bathroom doing nothing coz he didn't need to pee.

Bladders get full when they are ready not when its convenient for the teacher.

In answer to your question, using a toilet as a lunchbox would be worse, it would be completely sickening. Using a lunchbox for a toilet, at least the food can be kept safe by removing it first and you can just buy another lunchbox after-ward.

That teacher should be fired.

Answer 3

Toilet as a lunchbox. It would be nasty and heavy to lug around.

Answer 4

The worst punishment would be if it were used both at the same time.