Should there be any limits at all?
I can understand keeping an open mind about the possibility of extraterrestrial life or anything else that is plausible, but should I keep an open mind about my car turning into a unicorn?
Is it close minded to think dreams involve no actual travel outside of the body? Is it close minded, in the light of her claims and evidenced failures, to suspect Sylvia Browne of wholesale fraud? Is it close minded to believe all possible natural causes must first be eliminated before even considering paranormal causes?
Naturally, one should do what one can to avoid acting with prejudice should consider all evidence when evaluating a paranormal claim. One should use this evidence, along with reason, rationality and to some degree probability when doing before really jumping to any conclusion. However, I see many responses here where the default answer is: It must be paranormal. There is no other possible explanation.
Tags: