What are the weaknesses of Jean Piaget theory?

Question

In children under seven.

Answer 1

I second the preceding answer with regard to individual differences and rigid age restrictions. I read an English translation of Piaget's book on the origins of intelligence in 1966-67. I reread parts of it when my first children were young (son born in 1974 and daughter in 1977). My observation is that the passage from one stage to the next depends on two factors: accumulated experience and brain/body development.

Sometimes, we can find ways to help a child gain experience in spite of a brain/body development deficit. For example, one of my children was introduced to simple mathematics at any early age (like 3 or 4 years old) but was frustrated at trying to write the answers on the worksheets my wife gave. I suggested writing lots of numbers on paper and cutting them out. Let the child pick the answer and paste the little square of paper with the right number on the page. If the fine-motor control hasn't developed yet (and won't for another year or two or three), work around it using large-motor abilities.

Another thing I noticed when working with very young children is that it is very easy to underestimate their abilities to learn and solve problems. I found that very often when my child seemed bored with an "educational" activity it wasn't because the child was tired, had a short attention span, or the task was a little too difficult. I found that if I jumped ahead to a more difficult activity (more difficult by one or two stages), in most cases, the child would show great interest and learn rapidly.

Answer 2

he is FRENCH!!!

Answer 3

The stages are too rigid, not everyone develops in the same amount of time. They should be looked at as guidelines and not definates.