0 LIKES LikeUnLike
The argument "against" was the obvious detrimental effect the existing over human population is having on the earth's dwindling resourses and the impossibility of providing sufficient food to feed an ever growing population.The inevidable extinction of many species of wildlife is of course happening already at an alarming rate. The argument "for"was that the world is not over populated and if wildlife has to be depleted to accommodate the growing human population then so be it.Farming technology will always stay ahead of food requirements.
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 4 answers.