Question:

What brought WTC building 7 down?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Ok, so a planes went into the other two, so what happent to that one?

 Tags:

   Report

10 ANSWERS


  1. The damage caused to it by the other two buildings falling at least partially onto WTC building 7 caused it to loss structural integrity so it collapsed.


  2. it was "pulled"

  3. Two very big buildings right next to it crashing down around it.

    Addition:

      http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/7_W...

    I know you will blow this off as Bush cover-up propaganda, but if you don't believe this, nothing will change your mind anyway.

  4. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/sep...

  5. THE AFTERSHOCK.

  6. It was damaged when the towers crashed debris onto the building, which resulted in fires that were too numerous to control brought 7 down.

  7. A combination of factors. First, the debris from the collapse of the other two towers caused major structural damage. Part of this damage was knocking out the fire suppression system in the building. The damage also caused several fires in the building. The lack of a fire suppressing system along with low water pressure left the fire department unable to put out these blazes, which grew in strength. Eventually, the weakened structure and the fires combined to bring about the collapse of the building.

  8. Terrorists

  9. I believe in physics for dummies its called an aftershock from two large buildings near it falling.  It doesn't matter that no other building fell maybe #7 had a weaker structure or was compromised by the other two buildings somehow.  

    I realize there is some conspiracy theory out there about #7 but really a lot of people died, including some of my friends, leave it alone, our government did not do this.

  10. The same thing that brought the other 2 WTC buildings down...demolitions.

    Even though 2 of the buildings were hit by planes (or perhaps missiles), it was pre-placed demolitions that brought the 3 buildings down.

    Certainly, there was a conspiracy to deny that there was pre-place demolitions. But the pre-placed demolitions don't necessarily mean there was a government conspiracy to create a false-flag operation. Perhaps, they were placed there in case planes or something hit them and they wanted to bring them straight down instead of them falling on other buildings...or to prevent people from getting to important information inside the buildings.

    Perhaps many of the big important buildings have pre-placed demolitions. If so, I can see why they'd lie about them being there. People would freak out if they learned they work in or live around buildings with demolitions in them.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 10 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.