Question:

What created the universe? Do u believe in evolution or creation?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

BOOM! BiG bang! do you believe in it?

Supposedly a big explosion happened hurling matter and energy and thus began the expansion of the universe,

yet somehow earth and humans came to be.

How and why?

Will we go through heat death, and the universe compress, and upon compression will the universe then an explosion occur thus creating another universe.

But where did this matter and energy come from, according to science, NOTHING can Come from nothing, Energy can't be created, but i can die out

 Tags:

   Report

16 ANSWERS


  1. creation is more real (that theory has been around longer and wasn't spawned from some crazy man showing up one day with an idea). If you look into it, Science actually supports creation more.


  2. I believe that creation really existed. There is God and He is the governor and creator of the universe. Though we have learned in Science that lots of theories had been formulated in creating the universe but these just evolved in their imaginations which is hardly to prove to be true.

    Whereas when we say creation it is full stated in the Bible why there's a need for God to create the universe. If you really want to know if it's true, you can pray sincerely to God if these are true. God would reveal to you the truth.

  3. Theistic Evolution so I believe in both  :)

  4. well why not both since according to the probability theory both have the same chance of being created from nothing.,  although i prefer to believe in an intelligent creator since there is an old thought experiment that says if you smash a watch and put the pieces in a shoe box and let it float in space will those pieces spontaneously come back together after a trillion years?

  5. A thought spoken.

  6. i dont care anymore, i live, i exist right now that is what matters, to enjoy what i have and what i can understand and not get stuck on what others would like me to believe like religion or scientific theory that no one would really be able to validate, why waste my time trying to answer something that is already a useless argument, i am here, you are here we are alive that is what matters.

  7. I FLY JET STARRRRRRRRRR!

    go created the universe, theres not buts!

  8. "Existence is a self-sufficient primary. It is not a product of a supernatural dimension, or of anything else. There is nothing antecedent to existence, nothing apart from it—and no alternative to it. Existence exists—and only existence exists. Its existence and its nature are irreducible and unalterable."

    Leonard Peikoff “The Analytic-Synthetic Dichotomy,” from

    Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology; Ayn Rand

    But the long, more ontological answer is this:

    " Naturalism, challenging the cogency of the cosmological, teleological, and moral arguments, holds that the universe requires no supernatural cause and government, but is self-existent, self-explanatory, self-operating, and self-directing, that the world-process is not teleological and anthropocentric, but purposeless, deterministic (except for possible tychistic events), and only incidentally productive of man; that human life, physical, mental, moral and spiritual, is an ordinary natural event attributable in all respects to the ordinary operations of nature; and that man's ethical values, compulsions, activities, and restraints can be justified on natural grounds, without recourse to supernatural sanctions, and his highest good pursued and attained under natural conditions, without expectation of a supernatural destiny."

    http://www.ditext.com/runes/n.html


  9. I believe in creation .

  10. Evolution is a lie



    This is what one person said here "You're asking two very different questions. Evolution doesn't claim to tell us how the universe was created, only how species change over time. Creationism is the doctrine that erroneously claims to have all the answers about the beginning of the universe, with absolutely no evidence to support it.

    Furthermore, energy can't "die out" - it can be neither created nor destroyed. Energy will still exist if and when the universal "heat death" comes about - it will just not be in a form that can support transfer.

    I agree with you that I see no reason to believe in Creationism. No more than the Flying Spaghetti Monster, all praise be to His Noodley Appendage.

        * 2 days ago

    NO edvidence what about  radio halos there is a bunch of evidence if you say species change is evolution then i agree  

  11. You're asking two very different questions. Evolution doesn't claim to tell us how the universe was created, only how species change over time. Creationism is the doctrine that erroneously claims to have all the answers about the beginning of the universe, with absolutely no evidence to support it.

    Furthermore, energy can't "die out" - it can be neither created nor destroyed. Energy will still exist if and when the universal "heat death" comes about - it will just not be in a form that can support transfer.

    I agree with you that I see no reason to believe in Creationism. No more than the Flying Spaghetti Monster, all praise be to His Noodley Appendage.

  12. The primacy of existence, existence has and will always exist.

    Non-existence can not and does not exists, the proof is existence.

    Science and philosophy attempt to probe existence prior to our universe, but at this time it is little more than unconfirmed speculation.

  13. http://video.rationalresponders.com/vide...

    http://www.rationalresponders.com/


  14. Universe is self created!

    yes i bliv in evolution and creation,

    But there is no how in evolution and creation Because its natural,

  15. The big bang is not evolution. Evolution is the changing of living creatures to fit. The big bang is the process by which the universe came into existence. Both have massive and substantiated evidence in their favour. They therefore earn the right to be scientific theories. So it follows that it is not about belief but fact.

    Creationism has zero evidence so cannot even reach the statue of a hypothesis. It is closer to fairytale.

  16. As you are a student of science then please do clear your concepts about everything.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 16 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.