What did Mirza Qadiyani bring to the table

Question

that was not already established by other 'learned' people

Answer 1

he went on wrong way!!

i feel sorry for his followers!!

Answer 2

so "What did Mirza Qadiyani bring to the table?"

short answer is 1qfactor and now sunflower

Mirza says that he is a nabi and 4 that he get payed from Isreal and America.and once he said :

"My risalat is totally diffrent of Mohammeds"so who is Qadiyaniy is not muyslim that is too a short answer

if ytou want more you can ask Maryam (No nationalism )or otherwise or not afraid to stand alone"

Answer 3

this mirza is nothing but a cockroach

read his silly book "ترياق القلوب" (antidote of hearts) and see how brazenly he talked about ALLAH(swt)

Answer 4

What did he brought to the  table ????

KUFR ,Insult of prophets ,Fatwa of Kufr and Abusive language For alll those who rejected him , Just Twisting Words And claim that he threw Alll hadith Which Contradicted his WAHI in dustbin.

Answer 5

Nothing just empty plates,lol.

Answer 6

In the beginning he was a muslim..then he decided he was above all and made himself extraordinaire.

and at the end died a waste-full death Naudubillaah.

Answer 7

What did he bring to the table? Let's listen to his own son!

According to Mirza Mahmood: "The words of His Holiness, Mirza, the messiah, still echo in my ears. He declared 'it is a wrong concept that our disagreement with the people is just limited to the death of Jesus or a few other issues'.

He (Mirza) told us that it extends to the entity of Allah, the Messenger (P.B.U.H), the Quran, fasting, Hajj and zakah (charity). Thus, he told us in detail that how our conflict with them covers every single issue"

Answer 8

He establish a new Religion called Qadiyanism.

New establishment of Mirza Qadiyani.

1.Jesus escaped from Palestine, got married, had children, died at the age of 120 years and was buried in Kashmir, a Muslim majority state under Indian occupation.

2.Ghulam Qadiyani claim that He is a Prophet BUT He frequently prayed behind one or the other of his followers; ask them in the matters of shari'ah (Islamic law) and depend upon their advice.

3.Ghulam Ahmad, despite his claims that he was from the progeny of the Prophet through his grand mothers he consumed Zakat and Sadaqah and these sources contributed to his large estate.

4.He and his family fought against Muslims, hand-in-hand with the disbeliever British ruler in the War of Independence of 1857 in India and were proud of their disgraceful acts. In support of the British, Ghulam Ahmad declared war for the removal of the British rule from India as illegal and against the teachings of his Islam.

Answer 9

As you may well agree that Imam Mahdi and Messih was not to bring anything new to Islam.  Hazrat Ahmad (as) did not change anything to the qur'an, nor add or delete anything to the sunnah.

He revived true Islam and established Khilafat per the Hadeeth of the Prophet (sa) I have put below.  Muslims who have accepted him, are unifying all over the world and enjoying the blessings of true, peaceful Islam, under Khilafat, alhumdolillah.

“‘Prophethood shall remain among you as long as Allah shall will. He will bring about its end and follow it with Khilafat on the precepts of prophet hood for as long as He shall will and then bring about its end. A tyrannical monarchy will then follow and will remain as long as Allah shall will and then come to an end. There will follow thereafter-monarchial despotism to last as long as Allah shall will and come to an end upon His decree. There will then emerge Khilafat on precept of Prophethood.’ The Holy Prophet said no more.” (masnad ahmad)

Oh, and he died a natural death.  Allah have mercy on those who speak without knowledge.

EDIT:

@Asker - You should know the hadeeth very well that Imam Mahdi and Messih will put an end to religious warfare.  Hazrat Ahmad (as) simply said that Islam will not spread by the sword - it never has, and it never will.

He taught that no Muslim should revolt against a government that gives freedom of religion.  Muhammad (sa) himself never revolted against Mecca but migrated instead.  How is Hazrat Ahmad (as) contradicting this?

love for all, hatred for none