What do you think is she guilty?

Question

a girl works at a bank

she cashed a check under mr smiths account on last day of work

check goes missing, mr smith says he never cashed a check that large before.

security says that the girl cashed a "fake check" then took the money

security says that they never checked her work station only the back room.

security tapes reveal nothing out of the ordinary, never see the girl take any money. mr smith is with the girl the entire time the transaction was done

bank managers have lied under oath saying the only way she could cash the check was with an unauthorized code that she was NEVER given.

bank employee handbook tells employees how to use this code and needs a managers approval in order for it to be processed.

so my question is how can this girl be found guilty of this crime?

security admitted that they did not see anything on the tape and that her work station was never checked, asst manager lied about an unauthorized code being used when it is clearly in the employee handbook. isn't it possible mr smith accidently was given back the check then lied saying he never cashed the check that way he got free money?

if you were the jury would you find this girl guilty?

Answer 1

You statements confuse me Was the unauthorized code available to her without her managers knowledge or was it the code in the handbook that was given to her? If she had possession of the unauthorized code that allowed her to cash a check without a manager's approval, then she maybe guilty.

Answer 2

I dont know hun.  I've never worked at a bank, I mean I send resumes from time to time, but they never call.  

Answer 3

I would need to see the rest of the evidence to determine guilt or innocence. Not nearly enough here.

Answer 4

No, if for no other reason, there is no evidence that she has been charged with any crime.