In a recent blog entry, Anthony Watts discussed a short-term decrease in atmospheric CO2 levels.
http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/mauna-loa-co2-january-to-july-trend-goes-negative-first-time-in-history/
Essentially the atmospheric CO2 level was abnormally low over a period of about 2 months. Watts used this short-term varation to arrive at several conclusions, such as
"A CO2 residence time of several hundred years seems unlikely now"
So his conclusion was based on March-April data. Now the May and June CO2 data is in, and it looks like this:
http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/co2_0608.jpg
Tamino at Open Mind harshly criticizes Watts for basing major conclusions on 2 months worth of data.
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/jump/
So what do you think - is Tamino being too critical, or was Watts' analysis an amateurish confusion of short-term and long-term variation?
Tags: